News Why Do Canadians Have Divergent Views on Terrorism Risk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kat
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Three years post-9/11, a CRIC Research survey reveals that 56% of Canadians believe a terrorist attack on Canada in the next two years is unlikely, while 42% consider it a real possibility. Quebecers show the least concern, with 67% dismissing the likelihood of an attack, whereas apprehension is highest in the Prairies, where 49% think an attack is likely. The discussion explores why opinions differ regionally, suggesting that the Prairies, being more conservative and less multicultural, may harbor greater insecurity due to limited interaction with diverse populations. Some participants express crude stereotypes about intelligence levels in the Prairies, leading to a broader debate about political perspectives and regional attitudes. The conversation touches on the perceived pretentiousness of generalizations and the complexities of political identity in Canada and the U.S.
kat
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Three years after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade towers in New York, most Canadians (56%) think possible terrorist attacks on Canada in the next two years are unlikely, but a sizable minority (42%) thinks the country could be the target of a major terrorist attack within that period.

Quebecers are the least worried. Sixty-seven percent do not believe an attack likely in the next two years while 29% consider it s real possibility.

Apprehension is highest in the Prairies where 49% think an attack is likely in the next two years while 50% held the opposite view.
This was from CRIC Research
http://www.cric.ca/en_re/analys/
What I'm wondering is why do Canadians think there is such a difference of opinion between those in the "prairies" and those elsewhere?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The prairies is where the mentality is closer to that in the the US. They are the most conservative-right. The Conservative opposition leader Harper is from that area.

My personnal opinion is that the entirety of central north America is more isolated from the rest of the world, and so more skeptical of it. There are probably much less Muslims and Arabs there than on the coasts and multicutural cites (esp. Vancouver, Toronto, and Montral), this lack of interaction might cause insecurity.

Also, much of Canada's French population is in the East, and it makes sense to them that Al-Qaida would go after France before them. Yet, any coalition force is probably higher on Laden's list than France. Attacking the Newfies would just be silly.
 
I'm going to be crude and say the prairies are full of rednecks and thus suffer from lower intelligence. (it's true that U of A has quite low entry standards by comparison to the rest of the country - I learned that today so i had to throw it in :-p )
 
*hands over mouth and face gets red*
 
Last edited:
Smurf said:
I'm going to be crude and say the prairies are full of rednecks and thus suffer from lower intelligence.

Good God.
 
Smurf said:
I'm going to be crude and say the prairies are full of rednecks and thus suffer from lower intelligence. (it's true that U of A has quite low entry standards by comparison to the rest of the country - I learned that today so i had to throw it in :-p )

Well you know, we Texans are nothin' but a bunch of gun totin' hootin' and hollerin' rednecks ourselves! WOOWEEEEHHH!
 
Smurf said:
I'm going to be crude and say the prairies are full of rednecks and thus suffer from lower intelligence. (it's true that U of A has quite low entry standards by comparison to the rest of the country - I learned that today so i had to throw it in :-p )

You just found out that us Americans are dumb now? Maybe you should be down here with us. You do realize that the majority of us Americans voted for Bush, that should have told you right away about the level of our inteligence :smile:
 
mattmns said:
You just found out that us Americans are dumb now? Maybe you should be down here with us. You do realize that the majority of us Americans voted for Bush, that should have told you right away about the level of our inteligence :smile:

Hey look, more cheap shots at the intelligence level of those who disagree with your political choice!
What I find amusing is the pure pretentiousness of it all! I mean, you don't even seem phased that, perhaps (and it could be argued easily with facts) that you are more likely to offend someone than find someone that agrees with your gross, and plainly immature, generalization.
 
Did I state my political choice? You just made a generalization about Texans, I made a generalization about Americans. I guess I thought you were being sarcastic, so I thought I would join you in this parade of sarcasm. I guess next time I will need to be more clear, so you Texans can understand what I am saying.
 
  • #10
mattmns said:
Did I state my political choice? You just made a generalization about Texans, I made a generalization about Americans. I guess I thought you were being sarcastic, so I thought I would join you in this parade of sarcasm. I guess next time I will need to be more clear, so you Texans can understand what I am saying.


Lay it on a little thicker...there are plenty on this board that FULLY agree with "You do realize that the majority of us Americans voted for Bush, that should have told you right away about the level of our inteligence "
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top