Why Do Electrons Move on Electrical Conductors? - Gr 9

AI Thread Summary
Electrons move on the surface of electrical conductors due to the influence of electric fields that induce a force on them. When electrons shift from their positions in the conductor's lattice, they create regions of positive and negative charge, generating an opposing electric field. This process leads to a buildup of electrons at the surface, as they arrange themselves to eliminate any net electric field within the conductor. In alternating current (AC) scenarios, electromagnetic waves induce similar electron movements, resulting in surface currents that cancel out incident fields before they penetrate the conductor. This behavior explains why both direct current (DC) and AC currents primarily flow on the surface of good conductors.
kyzill
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
can anyone tell me why electrons move on the skin of an electrical conductor?
I'm in gr 9, that's why this question is really simple.
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons are pretty much free to move about anywhere in and on a conductor. They will bump into things, scatter and give off energy, which is how resistance arises, but as long as you provide a force on the electrons you can move them anywhere in the conductor. An electric field, to which the electrons are directly responding to, induces a force on the electrons. However, when an electron moves from its desired place in the conductor's lattice, it leaves behind a region of slightly positive charge since it must be taken from a neutral atom. So now we have a local area of net positive charge where the electron was taken from and a local area of net negative charge where the electron is taken to. This creates its own electric field, one that opposes the applied electric field that moved the electron in the first place. So as we start displacing electrons with an applied field, they create a charge difference that creates a canceling electric field too.

So we end up moving the electrons to the surface of the conductor because that is the only real obstacle to their movement. The idea is, as long as there is a net field inside the conductor, the electrons will experience a force and will move to create a field to cancel out the applied field. So they naturally arrange themselves so that there is no net field inside the conductor and to do this they build up on the surface of the conductor.

That is what happens in the static case. In the AC case, a signal is propagated down the wire by electromagnetic waves. These waves are traveling electric and magnetic fields. The changing electric and magnetic fields will induce forces on the electrons just like they did before in the static case. And just like before in the static case, the resulting movement of the electrons will create fields that cancel out the applied fields. The result is that currents are induced in the conductor that create secondary waves that cancel out the incident waves. A conductor has very little resistance (zero if it is perfect) which means that the electrons can move almost completely free. Thus, they can respond almost perfectly to the incident fields. Since they can respond almost perfectly, the surface currents can completely cancel out the incident fields. So the fields are canceled out before they have a chance to penetrate into the conductor to induce movement of electrons inside. So that is a brief conceptual idea of why AC currents also only flow on the skin of a good or perfect electrical conductor.
 
Born2bwire said:
Electrons are pretty much free to move about anywhere in and on a conductor. They will bump into things, scatter and give off energy, which is how resistance arises, but as long as you provide a force on the electrons you can move them anywhere in the conductor. An electric field, to which the electrons are directly responding to, induces a force on the electrons. However, when an electron moves from its desired place in the conductor's lattice, it leaves behind a region of slightly positive charge since it must be taken from a neutral atom. So now we have a local area of net positive charge where the electron was taken from and a local area of net negative charge where the electron is taken to. This creates its own electric field, one that opposes the applied electric field that moved the electron in the first place. So as we start displacing electrons with an applied field, they create a charge difference that creates a canceling electric field too.

So we end up moving the electrons to the surface of the conductor because that is the only real obstacle to their movement. The idea is, as long as there is a net field inside the conductor, the electrons will experience a force and will move to create a field to cancel out the applied field. So they naturally arrange themselves so that there is no net field inside the conductor and to do this they build up on the surface of the conductor.

That is what happens in the static case. In the AC case, a signal is propagated down the wire by electromagnetic waves. These waves are traveling electric and magnetic fields. The changing electric and magnetic fields will induce forces on the electrons just like they did before in the static case. And just like before in the static case, the resulting movement of the electrons will create fields that cancel out the applied fields. The result is that currents are induced in the conductor that create secondary waves that cancel out the incident waves. A conductor has very little resistance (zero if it is perfect) which means that the electrons can move almost completely free. Thus, they can respond almost perfectly to the incident fields. Since they can respond almost perfectly, the surface currents can completely cancel out the incident fields. So the fields are canceled out before they have a chance to penetrate into the conductor to induce movement of electrons inside. So that is a brief conceptual idea of why AC currents also only flow on the skin of a good or perfect electrical conductor.
thanks! it was really useful but I am only in grade nine so you were going pretty fast!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top