Why do emergency detectors use high pitched sounds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Emergency detectors, such as carbon monoxide (CO) detectors, typically emit high-pitched sounds around 3 kHz due to the human ear's heightened sensitivity in the 2-5 kHz range. This frequency range is effective for alerting individuals, even as high-frequency hearing diminishes with age. The choice of high-pitched tones ensures that alarms are audible and can penetrate common background noises. Additionally, lower frequency alarms require larger speakers to achieve the same volume, making high-pitched sounds more practical for mass production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of human auditory perception and frequency sensitivity
  • Knowledge of sound frequency ranges (e.g., 2-5 kHz)
  • Familiarity with alarm system design principles
  • Awareness of the impact of aging on hearing capabilities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of aging on hearing and frequency perception
  • Explore sound design principles for alarm systems
  • Investigate alternative alert systems for the hearing impaired
  • Learn about the physics of sound propagation and frequency ranges
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for audio engineers, alarm system designers, and anyone interested in the intersection of human physiology and sound design, particularly in safety applications.

newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound? I got to my in laws and their detector needed new batteries. Neither are hard of hearing but neither had any idea their detector was going off. Made me wonder if they’d even be able to hear it if it went off for real?
noises
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Maybe because shrill sounds carry farther than lower frequencies?
 
phinds said:
carry farther than lower frequencies?
Do they? Google "elephant communication."
 
Bystander said:
Do they? Google "elephant communication."
Yeah, I googled around a bit. Turns out I apparently had it backwards.
 
Shrill is maybe 1 or 2 kHz? That's well within the peak of human hearing.
 
Smoke detectors aren't that high of a frequency. I believe they commonly use a frequency around 3 kHz.
 
phinds said:
?

That's very low on in the range of human hearing:

You're misreading something. 1.76 kHz is two A's above middle C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009 and berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
You're misreading something. 1.76 kHz is two A's above middle C.
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
 
  • #10
phinds said:
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
In terms of octaves, the human range is 11 octaves with 2 kHz falling in the 7th octave.

Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009
  • #11
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
Interesting question, which makes me think of many alarms clocks which also have (relatively) high pitched sounds. I wonder if it is beacuse it sounds more intense/is more annoying, so the listener is more inclined to take action or even wake up?

EDIT:
Janus said:
Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
Sounds like a good reason.
 
  • #12
LOL, nope, nope, nope.:smile:
newjerseyrunner said:
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...
Small, inexpensive piezo-based sound makers for low-cost consumer electronics happen to have that frequency range. You are not going to spend several dollars for a speaker-based sound maker in a product design, when you can use a simple sub-dollar piezo beeper instead... :smile:
 
  • #13
phinds said:
the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale.

Ah, here's the thing you are missing. Hearing is logarithmic. Each octave is a factor of two in frequency.

berkeman said:
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...

I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are mass produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009 and phinds
  • #14
Simple and solid state construction probably helps as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are massed produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
Just a commercial goodness coinkidink. :smile:
 
  • #17
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner
  • #18
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.

In reality, it is what @berkeman wrote under that spoiler button...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner and berkeman
  • #19
Lower frequency alarms need bigger speakers to achieve same volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner
  • #20
if i remember right the resonant frequency of the human ear canal is around 3khz, so I am guessing that has something to do with it as well..

i know when mastering a music track, its common to dip down the volume in that range.
 
  • #21
Rive said:
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.
Well, since birds already got mentioned - http://users.aber.ac.uk/rmm/urbansong.htm
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
575
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
12K