Why do rotating pulleys have different tensions on either side?

AI Thread Summary
Rotating pulleys exhibit different tensions on either side due to the influence of friction. When a massless cord wraps around a pulley with mass, friction alters the tension, as it acts in the same direction on one side while opposing it on the other. This discrepancy arises because Newton's third law, which typically dictates equal tensions, does not apply when external forces like friction are present. The separation of tensions occurs at the point where the string contacts the pulley. Understanding this interaction is crucial for analyzing systems involving pulleys and friction.
ximath
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

Suppose there is a a pulley with mass and a massless cord around it, if pulley is rotating then I have learned that there are different tensions on either side of the pulley. I am having some trouble visualizing it. Moreover, if there are two different tensions on the cords, where exactly they are separated from each other ?

I have searched a little bit and read that thread several times :
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1958707

There is a statement on that thread which is;

tiny-tim said:
but a string touching anything (like a pulley) with friction will have different tension on either side, even if the string is massless.

Could you please explain this further ? Why and how it can have different tension on either side, if a string is touching somewhere and where these tensions are separated ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ximath said:
Could you please explain this further ? Why and how it can have different tension on either side, if a string is touching somewhere and where these tensions are separated ?
tiny-tim said:
but a string touching anything (like a pulley) with friction will have different tension on either side, even if the string is massless.

oooh, that's me! :smile:

the reason the tension is usually the same on either side of a point on a string is that Newton's third law requires that the tensions are equal and opposite

but if you have an outside force … in this case, friction … then Newton's third law is irrelevant (to be precise, it just says that the string exerts a force on the pulley :rolleyes:), and the friction acts in the same direction on each side of the string

and so on one side it acts with the tension, and on the other it acts against the tension :smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top