Why do some devices work for a short time after unplugged?

AI Thread Summary
Some devices, like laptops and monitors, can briefly function after being unplugged due to residual charge in capacitors. This phenomenon is often mistaken for self-inductance in transformers, but it's primarily the output capacitors holding their charge. The "On" LED may still light up, indicating that some components are receiving power momentarily. In certain cases, devices may attempt to power up when an unpowered power supply is plugged in, again due to the charge stored in capacitors. Understanding these electrical principles clarifies why devices exhibit this behavior after disconnection from power.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
Some laptop or mobile phone chargers still work for a couple of seconds after being unplugged. I've also seen similar behaviour with the standby lights of monitors, TVs and other devices after they are disconnected from power. Is this due to self-inductance in the transformer? If so: If self-inductance is able to maintain a substantial current for several seconds, how can those transformers operate under normal conditions where the direction of current is supposed to change 100 times per second (at 50 Hz)?

Or is this just some capacitors discharging?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
Or is this just some capacitors discharging?
This.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
What makes you think anything except the "on" LED is working? (Particularly in devices without capacitors)
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What makes you think anything except the "on" LED is working? (Particularly in devices without capacitors)
For devices that I design, the "On" LED is just powered from the output rail through a resistor.

I have had multiple times when I've plugged an unpowered power supply brick into a device where the device tried to power up. That's just the output capacitors of the brick holding their charge an unexpectedly long time. :smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top