Why Do We Calculate the Probability of Phone Failure After Two Years?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem related to the failure of cell phones over time, specifically focusing on the time until failure described by a given density function. Participants are exploring the implications of this function in the context of a cell phone company's replacement policy after two years.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the correct interpretation of the probability density function and how it relates to the time until phone failure. There is confusion regarding the integration limits and the meaning of the probability of failure before or after two years.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the setup of the problem and clarifying the relationship between the probability of failure and the time frame of two years. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the probability as it relates to the desired outcome of not needing a replacement before two years.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of probability functions and their implications in a real-world scenario, highlighting potential misunderstandings about the nature of the problem and the definitions involved.

IntegrateMe
Messages
214
Reaction score
1
The phones offered by a cell phone company have some chance of failure after they are activated. Suppose that the density function p(t) describing the time t in years that one of their phones will fail is

p(t) = 1-e^{-λt} for t ≥ 0, and 0 otherwise.

The cell phone company offers its clients a replacement phone after two years if they sign a new contract. What is the probability that the client will not have to replace his phone before the company will give him a new one?

I tried solving the problem as follows:

\int_{-\infty}^2 1-e^{-λt}dt which would end up becoming \int_0^2 1-e^{-λt}dt since the function is 0 for everything t < 0.

However, the solution says that the answer is actually \int_2^\infty 1-e^{-λt}dt

I'm having trouble understanding why. If we're trying to find the probability that the client will not have to replace his phone before two years, why is the solution finding the probability that the phone will be defective after 2 years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your density function is for the "T = time to failure". You want it to last at least two years so you want P(T>2).
 
OK, but if the function describes when the phones *will* fail, wouldn't the interval T>2 describe the probability the phone will fail after 2 years, so we actually need to subtract 1 from this value?
 
IntegrateMe said:
OK, but if the function describes when the phones *will* fail, wouldn't the interval T>2 describe the probability the phone will fail after 2 years, so we actually need to subtract 1 from this value?

No. You want the phone to last two years so they don't have to replace it before then. That means you want it to fail sometime after 2 years. In other words, the probability of it lasting at least two years (which is what you want) is the same as the probability that the time of failure is greater than 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K