Why do we use Monte Carlo in order to calculate the VEV?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HighOnAcid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Monte carlo
HighOnAcid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It's not homework.
It's just a simple question occurred when I'm reading Monte Carlo method in QFT by Colin Morningstar.
Of course, I didn't study the QFT earlier. I'm just a regular(or retarded) undergraduate student and I just wanted to learn MCMC technique, and hoped to learn some applications of MCMC in physics.
I thought I got the basic idea and already programmed the first example of SHO.
However, I noticed he didn't provide proper motivation for MCMC method in order to evaluate vacuum expectation.
He provided exact solution of SHO deduced from the path-integral by hand.

So, I am wondering now. Why do we have to use MCMC to calculate the VEV, if we are able to calculate exact integral?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about path integral from what kind of action cannot be calculated.
It rules out actions from constant potential, harmonic potential, and Coulomb potential.

It's my first posting in this site. If I am violating some kind of rules of this site, please let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind. It was stupid question.
I think I got the answer.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top