Why does a control rod work in a nuclear reactor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the function and mechanics of control rods in nuclear reactors, particularly focusing on their role in neutron absorption and the implications for nuclear fission processes. Participants explore the differences between heavy and light elements in terms of neutron interactions, the materials used in control rods, and the thermal dynamics of uranium in various states.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that control rods absorb neutrons to prevent fission in uranium, questioning why the control rod material does not also undergo fission.
  • Another participant explains that only very heavy atoms like uranium, thorium, or plutonium can fission when bombarded with neutrons, while lighter atoms produce stable isotopes or decay without emitting neutrons.
  • It is mentioned that Boron-10 is commonly used in control rods, which absorbs neutrons and transforms into Boron-11.
  • A participant suggests that the mass of the atom is a deciding factor in neutron absorption and decay processes, comparing it to a neutron star in reverse.
  • Further details are provided about the composition of control rods, including boron carbide and other materials like hafnium and dysprosium, and their roles in controlling the reactor's neutron chain reaction.
  • One participant raises a question about the radioactivity of uranium in its ore state versus its enriched state, discussing the heat generated by uranium decay even when the reactor is subcritical.
  • Concerns are expressed about the potential for overheating in the reactor due to residual heat from uranium pellets after a reactor shutdown.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement on the basic functions of control rods and neutron absorption, but there are competing views on the implications of uranium's radioactivity and the thermal dynamics involved in reactor safety. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of heat dissipation and the conditions under which a meltdown could occur.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about neutron absorption cross-sections, the specific decay processes of isotopes, and the thermal properties of reactor materials. These aspects are not fully explored or resolved.

  • #31
Can I get in on this thread? I'd like to know if there is a limit to how long a control rod can be effective. Do they at some point become unable to absorb more electrons? Is this a theoretical limitation (like maybe taking 10,000 years) or a practical one (like not lasting the life of the plant it is operating in requiring new rods to replaced the worn out ones)? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
RickVS said:
Can I get in on this thread? I'd like to know if there is a limit to how long a control rod can be effective. Do they at some point become unable to absorb more electrons? Is this a theoretical limitation (like maybe taking 10,000 years) or a practical one (like not lasting the life of the plant it is operating in requiring new rods to replaced the worn out ones)? Thanks!
Yes - there is both a nuclear limit and a mechanical limit.

The nuclear limit is based on the depletion of boron 10 (B10). When the control blade looses so much worth (a measure of the ability of the rod to absorb neutrons) it is moved (shuffled or relocated) to a new less critical position, and a fresh rod is put in the place, which is usually the 'shutdown' bank.

Control blades are also subject to mechanical limits due to irradiation effects, e.g., irradation-assisted stress corrosion cracking, or mechanical deterioration of the handle and structural parts, and also the internal pressure due to He production from the neutron capture by B10, which produces an (n, alpha) reaction.

At some point the control rod is removed from the core and placed in the spent fuel pool. Ultimately it is cut up and sent to a disposal repository.
 
  • #33
Astronuc said:
Yes - there is both a nuclear limit and a mechanical limit.

The nuclear limit is based on the depletion of boron 10 (B10). When the control blade looses so much worth (a measure of the ability of the rod to absorb neutrons) it is moved (shuffled or relocated) to a new less critical position, and a fresh rod is put in the place, which is usually the 'shutdown' bank.
If I understand correctly, you are saying that control rods (shutdown) are the newest, but that there may be variability in their age (life-cycle as (shutdown) control rods)? Older rods would be used to control the arrangement or geometry of (power generation) normal reactivity?
 
  • #34
How about making small RTG(radioactive thermoelectric generator) assembled nuclear power plant? First make small RTGs in the battery plant, and power station only assemble them.
And used battery is retreated, and use it again. At the present high voltage technology is not developed, but we can make high voltage by using solar energy collection method.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K