Why does a control rod work in a nuclear reactor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Control rods in nuclear reactors function by absorbing neutrons, preventing them from causing fission in Uranium and other fissile materials. Typically made from Boron-10, these rods transition to Boron-11 upon neutron absorption, which does not lead to further neutron emission. The effectiveness of control rods is due to their high absorption cross-section for thermal neutrons, allowing precise control over the neutron chain reaction in both Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR). Additionally, enriched Uranium, while more concentrated, does not increase the decay rate of individual atoms but does result in a higher likelihood of neutron collisions, necessitating careful thermal management even in subcritical states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron absorption and fission processes in nuclear physics.
  • Familiarity with isotopes, specifically Boron-10 and Uranium isotopes.
  • Knowledge of nuclear reactor types, particularly Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR).
  • Basic concepts of thermal management in nuclear systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the neutron absorption cross-section of various isotopes, focusing on Boron and Hafnium.
  • Study the operational principles of Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR).
  • Examine the thermal management strategies employed in nuclear reactors, especially during subcritical operations.
  • Explore the nuclear fuel cycle, including the processes of uranium extraction and enrichment.
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor operators, and anyone involved in nuclear safety and thermal management will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on control rod design and reactor operation.

  • #31
Can I get in on this thread? I'd like to know if there is a limit to how long a control rod can be effective. Do they at some point become unable to absorb more electrons? Is this a theoretical limitation (like maybe taking 10,000 years) or a practical one (like not lasting the life of the plant it is operating in requiring new rods to replaced the worn out ones)? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
RickVS said:
Can I get in on this thread? I'd like to know if there is a limit to how long a control rod can be effective. Do they at some point become unable to absorb more electrons? Is this a theoretical limitation (like maybe taking 10,000 years) or a practical one (like not lasting the life of the plant it is operating in requiring new rods to replaced the worn out ones)? Thanks!
Yes - there is both a nuclear limit and a mechanical limit.

The nuclear limit is based on the depletion of boron 10 (B10). When the control blade looses so much worth (a measure of the ability of the rod to absorb neutrons) it is moved (shuffled or relocated) to a new less critical position, and a fresh rod is put in the place, which is usually the 'shutdown' bank.

Control blades are also subject to mechanical limits due to irradiation effects, e.g., irradation-assisted stress corrosion cracking, or mechanical deterioration of the handle and structural parts, and also the internal pressure due to He production from the neutron capture by B10, which produces an (n, alpha) reaction.

At some point the control rod is removed from the core and placed in the spent fuel pool. Ultimately it is cut up and sent to a disposal repository.
 
  • #33
Astronuc said:
Yes - there is both a nuclear limit and a mechanical limit.

The nuclear limit is based on the depletion of boron 10 (B10). When the control blade looses so much worth (a measure of the ability of the rod to absorb neutrons) it is moved (shuffled or relocated) to a new less critical position, and a fresh rod is put in the place, which is usually the 'shutdown' bank.
If I understand correctly, you are saying that control rods (shutdown) are the newest, but that there may be variability in their age (life-cycle as (shutdown) control rods)? Older rods would be used to control the arrangement or geometry of (power generation) normal reactivity?
 
  • #34
How about making small RTG(radioactive thermoelectric generator) assembled nuclear power plant? First make small RTGs in the battery plant, and power station only assemble them.
And used battery is retreated, and use it again. At the present high voltage technology is not developed, but we can make high voltage by using solar energy collection method.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K