Why does a falling object experience constant acceleration due to gravity?

AI Thread Summary
Falling objects experience constant acceleration due to gravity at 9.8 m/s² until they reach terminal velocity, where air resistance balances gravitational force. Air resistance acts as a retarding force, affecting the overall acceleration of the object. According to Newton's Law, the net force determines acceleration; when gravitational force equals air resistance, the object stops accelerating and moves at a constant speed. The discussion clarifies that while gravity continuously pulls the object down, air resistance increases with speed, ultimately leading to terminal velocity. Understanding these forces is essential to grasping why falling objects behave as they do in an atmosphere.
BRH
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that there is constant acceleration due to gravity. A regular force that is applied to a moving object causes the object to accelerate once and as long as the force is present. Meaning, if a ball that is rolling experiences a wind force of 5N the ball's movement will increase 2 mph for example... as long as the wind force is present. Why is it that by gravity the falling object keeps on accelerating every second 9.8m/s. Why doesn't it just accelerate once 9.8 and that's it, until reaching terminal velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is it that by a falling object if the object doesn't reach terminal velocity, it always falls with acceleration of 9.8m/s. It doesn't matter if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 4N or if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 1N... Why doesn't air resistance make a difference as to how much the object will accelerate?
 
BRH said:
I know that there is constant acceleration due to gravity. A regular force that is applied to a moving object causes the object to accelerate once and as long as the force is present. Meaning, if a ball that is rolling experiences a wind force of 5N the ball's movement will increase 2 mph for example... as long as the wind force is present. Why is it that by gravity the falling object keeps on accelerating every second 9.8m/s. Why doesn't it just accelerate once 9.8 and that's it, until reaching terminal velocity?
BRH said:
How is it that by a falling object if the object doesn't reach terminal velocity, it always falls with acceleration of 9.8m/s. It doesn't matter if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 4N or if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 1N... Why doesn't air resistance make a difference as to how much the object will accelerate?
Welcome to the PF.

Air resistance does affect the total acceleration of falling objects in an atmosphere. It is a retarding force, The sum of the two forces (gravity down and air resistance up) gives the total force and thus the total acceleration by Newton's Law:

ΣF = ma

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
BRH said:
How is it that by a falling object if the object doesn't reach terminal velocity, it always falls with acceleration of 9.8m/s. It doesn't matter if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 4N or if the object has a gravity of 5N and air resistance of 1N... Why doesn't air resistance make a difference as to how much the object will accelerate?

berkeman said:
Air resistance does affect the total acceleration of falling objects in an atmosphere. It is a retarding force, The sum of the two forces (gravity down and air resistance up) gives the total force and thus the total acceleration by Newton's Law:

... and when the 2 forces are equal ... the upwards force of the air resistance Vs the downwards force of gravity ...
then the total force = 0 (zero) and with zero force, there is zero acceleration and hence a terminal (fixed ) velocity
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top