Acceleration due to gravity of a rocket

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of total acceleration for a rocket launched upwards, particularly how to account for the acceleration due to gravity in the context of upward thrust. Participants explore the relationship between gravitational acceleration and the rocket's initial acceleration, questioning the addition versus subtraction of these values in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²) is added to the upward acceleration (x) when calculating total acceleration, suggesting it should be subtracted instead.
  • Another participant points out that adding a negative value effectively means subtraction, but expresses confusion over the conventional explanation that suggests adding the positive value of gravity.
  • Several participants request more context or clarification regarding the problem statement from the book, indicating a need for clearer explanations.
  • A participant provides a rearranged equation to clarify the relationship between net acceleration, gravitational acceleration, and thrust, emphasizing the importance of vector direction.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding the thrust needed to just lift off the ground can help clarify the total thrust required for upward acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether to add or subtract gravitational acceleration in the context of upward thrust calculations. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple perspectives on how to interpret the relationship between these accelerations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for a free body diagram to better understand the forces at play, indicating that visual aids may clarify the balance of forces involved in the rocket's motion.

AlphaA
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If an object say a rocket is thrown up in the sky with an additional acceleration say ' x ' , then why do we add the value of acceleration due to gravity i.e 9.8 m/s^2 to the acceleration ' x' in order to find the total acceleration...
Since vector of acceleration due to gravity is directed downwards...so we consider it - 9.8 m/s^2 . So in accordance to this, if we find total acceleration then we should subtract 9.8 m/s^2 from 'x ' m/s^2 because...firstly, gravity is -9.8 m/s^2 and secondly, acceleration due to gravity will constantly decrease if the rocket or object will continue going up int he sky with that X acceleration. So why should 9.8 m/s^2 be added to X m/s^2 and not subtracted ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you add a negative value you're subtracting it, no?
##a+(-b)=a-b##
 
Bandersnatch said:
If you add a negative value you're subtracting it, no?
##a+(-b)=a-b##
But as the bookish explanation says, we add the positive value of acceleration due to gravity and not the negative one...
So here adding it means adding it only...
That's why I am confused...
Need some help and guidance
 
That doesn't seem right. Can you provide more context for the question? Perhaps a verbatim description of the problem as stated in your book? (a picture will do)
 
Bandersnatch said:
That doesn't seem right. Can you provide more context for the question? Perhaps a verbatim description of the problem as stated in your book? (a picture will do)
The example goes on like this :

A rocket with a lift-off mass 20,000 kg is blasted upwards with an initial acceleration of 5.0 m/s^2 . Find the initial thrust(force) of the blast.
Take g=9.8 m/s^2

Solution (as given in my book) :
The rocket moves up against gravity with an acceleration of 5.0 m/s^2 .
Hence the blast produces a total acceleration of =
a=9.8+ 5.0 =14.8 m/s^2
By Newton's II law, the initial thrust(force) of the blast is =
F=ma = 20,000 kg x 14.8 m/s^2 =2.96 x 10^5 N.
Therefore, answer is 2.96 x 10^5 N
 
Last edited:
AlphaA said:
The example goes on like this :

A rocket with a lift-off mass 20,000 kg is blasted upwards with an initial acceleration of 5.0 m/s^2 . Find the initial thrust(force) of the blast.
Take g=9.8 m/s^2

Solution (as given in my book) :
The rocket moves up against gravity with an acceleration of 5.0 m/s^2 .
Hence the blast produces a total acceleration of =
a=9.8+ 5.0 =14.8 m/s^2
By Newton's II law, the initial thrust(force) of the blast is =
F=ma = 20,000 kg x 14.8 m/s^2 =2.96 x 10^5 N.
My doubt is the underlined portion only. If the rocket moves against gravity then why should acceleration due to gravity be added to the initial acceleration?
 
That could be written more clearly to show what's going on.

Try this:
##a=g+t##
where a is the net acceleration (5m/s^2, positive is up), g is the gravitational acceleration (-9.8m/s^2) and t is the thrust you want to find. Here, the signs show you the directions of the vectors.

If you rearrange the above to solve for t, you get the equation in your book.
The book simply went straight for the rearranged equation.

Note that the acceleration due to gravity is not
AlphaA said:
added to the initial acceleration
but is deducted from the net (initial) acceleration. ##-(-9.8) = +9.8##
 
Last edited:
AlphaA said:
My doubt is the underlined portion only. If the rocket moves against gravity then why should acceleration due to gravity be added to the initial acceleration?
To get the proper acceleration, relative to free fall. That's what the engine must provide to cancel gravity and accelerate up.
 
Bandersnatch said:
That could be written more clearly to show what's going on.

Try this:
##a=g+t##
where a is the net acceleration (5m/s^2, positive is up), g is the gravitational acceleration (-9.8m/s^2) and t is the thrust you want to find. Here, the signs show you the directions of the vectors.

If you rearrange the above to solve for t, you get the equation in your book.
The book simply went straight for the rearranged equation.

Not that the acceleration due to gravity is not

but is deducted from the net (initial) acceleration. ##-(-9.8) = +9.8##

Oh...THANKYOU soooooooooooooooo much...
I got it!
I can now see it clearly...yaa...I've undersood it now...
Once again...THANKS A LOT !
It was really very sweet of you to guide me ...
Gratitude.
 
  • #10
5 - (-9.8)=14.8

Chet
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
5 - (-9.8)=14.8

Chet
Thank you so much .. Sir...
I got it !...
It was really simple and I was stuck at it like anything...
Thank you so much for helping me out.
 
  • #12
AlphaA said:
Thank you so much .. Sir...
I got it !...
It was really simple and I was stuck at it like anything...
Thank you so much for helping me out.
It would have been much easier if you had drawn a free body diagram of the rocket, and then, based on the free body diagram, written the force balance:

F - mg = ma

Chet
 
  • #13
If the rocket moves against gravity then why should acceleration due to gravity be added to the initial acceleration?

Perhaps think like this...

How much thrust would the rocket have to produce so that it only just manages to lift off the ground without accelerating upwards?

Then how much more does it have to produce to accelerate upwards at "a"?

What's the total?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K