Why does a gyroscope resist rotating towards the ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FIphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscope
AI Thread Summary
Gyroscopes resist rotating towards the ground due to the principles of angular momentum and torque. When a gyroscope is spinning, it maintains its angular momentum, which creates a dynamic equilibrium between the gravitational force trying to pitch it down and the precession that pushes it up. The discussion emphasizes understanding the motion in quadrants of the gyroscope's rotation, where the mass shifts in relation to the swivel axis, affecting its tendency to pitch. This balance of forces is crucial in explaining the gyroscope's stability. Overall, the gyroscope's resistance to tipping is a result of these complex interactions of motion and forces.
FIphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Today in class we have an intro to gyroscopes where my professor gave the classic "bicycle wheel" example where he spun a bicycle wheel to give it significant angular velocity, attached one end of the wheel apparatus to a string fixed to the ceiling, and let the wheel hang and precess (just like as shown in this video ). I understand how the angular momentum is in the -x direction (typically cartesian 3-d system) and the torque due to the gravitational force is in the +z direction, but I cannot rectify this with why the wheel resists rotated towards the ground. Can anyone help me to understand this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Watching that video was almost a spiritual experience.

Not sure I follow your coordinate system, but if you paint a red dot on the tire representing an atom, it sure wants to go in a straight line as much as it can. The spokes keep it in a circular motion, but gravity doesn't have much of a say in this until the red dot has lost momentum to friction.
 
FIphysics said:
I cannot rectify this with why the wheel resists rotated towards the ground.

attachment.php?attachmentid=24771&d=1270068885.png


The first image shows a gimbal mounted gyroscope wheel. From outside to inside there is a yellow housing and a red housing. (I will get to the green arrows - and another detail - later.)

I will define three axes:
# Roll axis - the gyroscope wheel spins around the roll axis.

# Pitch axis - motion of the red housing, as you can see, the gimbal mounting ensures the pitch axis is perpendicular to the roll axis.

# Swivel axis - motion of the yellow housing.


First start the gyroscope wheel spinning fast. Then add some swivel.
The second image shows a single quadrant.

attachment.php?attachmentid=27073&d=1279725740.png


Rather than trying to mentally follow the entire wheel as it spins I suggest you divide in four quadrants, and you consider the mechanics of the motion in each quadrant.

I will concentrate on the quadrant of the second image now.

The mass in that quadrant is moving towards the swivel axis. Think of a point particle somewhere along the wheel rim, for example the point where the green arrow starts. That point is circumnavigating the swivel axis, with a corresponding velocity. Moving closer to the swivel axis the point has a tendency to pull ahead of the overall rotation. (Compare what happens when you twirl around an object tied to a string. Pull on the string to make it shorter and the object goes around faster.)

Repeating the first image:

attachment.php?attachmentid=24771&d=1270068885.png


(The brown cilinder represents a weight that tends to pitch the gyroscope wheel.)

In two of the quadrants the wheel mass is moving towards the swivel axis, in the other two away from the swivel axis.

The green arrows represent precession-caused tendency for each quadrant. Combining the four quadrants you see there is a pitching effect.

You can apply that finding to the example of the bicycle wheel demonstration. When the bicycle wheel is precessing there is a state of dynamic equilibrium. Gravity imparts a tendency to pitch down, the precessing motion imparts a tendency to pitch up. Those two tendencies are in dynamic equilibrium.

Full story, including math, is in the http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/phys256/gyroscope_physics.php" article on my website.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny how my fast spinning car tires don't prevent me from flipping over in a bad turn.
OK, that's just humor...
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top