I Why does a Pressure Washer clean better than a Garden Hose?

AI Thread Summary
Bernoulli's equation illustrates the relationship between static, dynamic, and hydrostatic pressures, indicating that an increase in fluid velocity correlates with an increase in force exerted on an object. This principle is exemplified by the effectiveness of a pressure washer compared to a garden hose, where higher fluid velocity and pressure result in greater force acting on debris. The discussion confirms that increased velocity does indeed lead to increased force in a streamline, which is crucial for applications like moving ships or planes faster. Additionally, the required water velocity to achieve sufficient ram-pressure to exceed atmospheric pressure for cleaning surfaces is approximately 14.24 m/s. Overall, both velocity and pressure are essential in understanding the forces involved in fluid dynamics and cleaning applications.
JoeyF
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
If you think about a pressure washer and its ability to wash debris from a surface much more effectively than a garden hose, is this explained by it's increased fluid velocity, pressure, or both? Due to its increased velocity and pressure, can we assume that the forces acting on debris are higher?
32cf578dda08289d0df26aa4e7a732f5161393c6


In Bernoulli's equation, you have static, dynamic, and hydrostatic pressures equal to a constant. In one sense, I'm wondering if the dynamic part of the equation explains this since -> Pressure = (1/2*rho*velocity^2) and pressure can be expressed as a force / unit area, therefore, an increase in velocity translates to an increase in Force.

There is also the drag equation:
5b3bf12f95f6d0174755a9248ba34e638cf90310

An increase in velocity would also be an increase in force. It's the same exponential relationship, so I'm wondering if it's synonymous.

Is it safe to say an increase in velocity results in an increase in force on an object in that streamline? Can somebody help answer/explain this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoeyF said:
Summary:: If you think about a pressure washer and its ability to wash debris from a surface much more effectively than a garden hose, is this explained by it's increased fluid velocity, pressure, or both? Due to its increased velocity and pressure, can we assume that the forces acting on debris are higher?
Yes to everything. The velocity is higher, therefore the force and pressure on the incident surface are both higher.

JoeyF said:
Is it safe to say an increase in velocity results in an increase in force on an object in that streamline? Can somebody help answer/explain this?
Yes, that's correct. This is why it takes more power to move a ship faster through the water or a plane faster through the air.
 
JoeyF said:
Summary:: If you think about a pressure washer and its ability to wash debris from a surface much more effectively than a garden hose, is this explained by it's increased fluid velocity, pressure, or both? Due to its increased velocity and pressure, can we assume that the forces acting on debris are higher?

Is it safe to say an increase in velocity results in an increase in force on an object in that streamline? Can somebody help answer/explain this?
Cleaning concrete with water requires the water open and enter the gap between the dirt and the concrete. The dirt may be held in place by atmospheric pressure and some chemical bonds. Materials such as oil, bitumen or wax, may be quite difficult to separate from what was dry concrete. When the only solvent available is water, the pressure must break the bond between the dirt and the originally dry concrete.

What water velocity is needed for the ram-pressure, ½·ρ·v², to exceed atmospheric pressure?
 
Baluncore said:
Cleaning concrete with water requires the water open and enter the gap between the dirt and the concrete. The dirt may be held in place by atmospheric pressure and some chemical bonds. Materials such as oil, bitumen or wax, may be quite difficult to separate from what was dry concrete. When the only solvent available is water, the pressure must break the bond between the dirt and the originally dry concrete.

What water velocity is needed for the ram-pressure, ½·ρ·v², to exceed atmospheric pressure?
14.24 m/s
 
I think 14.142 m/s would qualify as “slower than a pressure washer”, and “faster than a garden hose”.

The geometry of the contact and the chemical bonds will make a difference, but so will disintegration of a particulate material, or the chemical solution of a cement or glue in the water.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top