Why Does a Triangular Load on a Beam Require Multiple Moment Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonlocalworlds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a triangular distributed load on a simply supported beam, particularly focusing on the necessity of multiple moment calculations to account for the load's effects. Participants are examining the equivalence of the triangular load to a concentrated load and the implications for moment calculations in the context of civil engineering principles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a triangular load with varying magnitudes at its ends and expresses confusion about the moments generated by this load, particularly regarding the moment at the centroid and the tapering end of the load.
  • Another participant suggests avoiding the use of "L" for distances that could lead to confusion, indicating that "L" typically represents the total length of the beam.
  • A sketch is provided to clarify the configuration of the beam and loads, although the details of the sketch are not included in the text.
  • A further clarification is made regarding the placement of a concentrated load related to the triangular load, specifying its magnitude and location in relation to the beam's supports.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express confusion and seek clarification on the moment calculations related to the triangular load. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the load distribution and its effects on the moments, indicating ongoing disagreement and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the definitions of distances and load placements, which may affect the calculations and understanding of the problem. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the load distribution and its implications for moment calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for civil engineering students preparing for exams, particularly those studying load analysis on beams, as well as professionals interested in the nuances of structural analysis involving distributed loads.

nonlocalworlds
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that shows a triangular distributed load on a beam (studying for NCEES civil engineering exam). At one end of the triangle we have a force magnitude level of "w" and the other end is labeled "wL/6."

They tell me that a triangular load is equivalent to a concentrated load of (1/2)wL acting at the centroid.

My load is on a simply supported beam on either end. To get the 'correct' answer the moments about one of the simple supports are added together and set equal to zero (non-rotating system). There is an unknown moment on the opposite simple support (that the problem is trying to get you figure out), but then my confusion is that there appears to be two counteracting forces, a moment at the centroid of the triangular load as well as another moment where it tapers off (the triangular load is shown at a maximum w on top of the simple support whose counteracting moment I am trying to find, and tapers to wL/6 at a distance L from the unknown simple support, with the final simple support being 2L away from the unknown location).

I do not understand why all of the load is not accounted with the moment expression for the concentrated load at the centroid of the triangle.

Apparently the correct expression is:

X*2L (unknown moment to calculate) - (wL/6)L (a moment at the point the triangle tapers whose inclusion I don't understand) - (wL/2)(5/3L) (this part is fine, the concentrated load at the centroid) = 0.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am confused as well by your description of the triangular load. Try not to use L for the distance to the start of the load or from the end of the load to the support. Generally, L is used to indicate the total length of the beam.

If you could post a sketch of the problem, that would save quite a bit of hand-waving explanation.
 
sketch
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-17 at 4.13.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-17 at 4.13.48 PM.png
    20.8 KB · Views: 12,880
The beam in question has a concentrated load of ##w_0L/6## located at x = L from point A. (Total length of the beam = 2L). This concentrated load is not related to the triangular load distributed between 0 < x < L, with ##w_0## @ x = 0 as its load magnitude. The equivalent concentrated load would be ##w_0L/2## located @ x = L/3 from point A.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
61
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K