Why Does Increasing Minor Principal Stress Decrease von Mises Stress?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DTM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress Von mises
AI Thread Summary
Increasing minor principal stress reduces von Mises stress due to the relationship between principal stresses and shear stress, which is critical for understanding failure in ductile materials. Specifically, von Mises stress is calculated based on the differences between principal stresses, and as the minor principal stress rises, the difference decreases, leading to lower von Mises stress and reduced failure likelihood. The discussion highlights that while shear stress is a primary factor in ductile failure, hydrostatic pressure does not contribute to this failure mode. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical and experimental context behind these formulas for deeper comprehension. Overall, grasping these concepts aids in the effective application of structural analysis in engineering.
DTM
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Following the formula for von Mises stress, can you give an intuitive explanation of why the von Mises stress may go down when the minor principal stress goes up.
The formula for von Mises stress for a plane stress (2d) condition with no shear stress is:
1684346630404.png

So if S1 = 1000, S2 = 0 , then Svm = 1000.

If the S2 is now increased from 0 to 500. The von Mises stress will go from 1000 to 866

I understand this is how the equation works, but can someone give me an intuitive understanding of why, when you increase a minor principal stress, the von Mises stress (and the likelihood of failure) should go down?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
VM stress is a measure of shear which is a function of the DIFFERENCES of the principal stresses. Don’t forget that the third principal stress is zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cherish, Chestermiller and DTM
Frabjous said:
VM stress is a measure of shear which is a function of the DIFFERENCES of the principal stresses. Don’t forget that the third principal stress is zero.
So differences in principal stresses is what makes ductile metals fail. That does make some sense and is somewhat intuitive. Thank you.
 
Here is a nice video about failure theories which includes Von Mises.



I recommend checking out almost all vídeos from that channel. It's fantastic.

This actually raises the question of why is it that shear stress is responsible for failure in ductile materials while hydrostatic pressure does not contribute. Often textbooks present this kind of information as FACTS because it is not really necessary to know the underlying reasons to be able to squeeze every drop of utility out of a structure by using math.
Since the amount of material to be covered during courses is huge, more often than not these kinds of details are left for the student to research on their own if interested or in separate courses. In my opinion, knowing the experimental and historical context within which such formulas are derived usually helps significantly in their understanding.

Here is some additional info about that hydrostatic pressure scenario and failure modes.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...l through shear,move dislocations in this way
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and DTM
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top