Why Does Increasing Minor Principal Stress Decrease von Mises Stress?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DTM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress Von mises
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between minor principal stress and von Mises stress in the context of failure theories for ductile materials. Participants explore the implications of increasing minor principal stress on von Mises stress, particularly in a plane stress condition without shear stress, and seek an intuitive understanding of this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the calculation of von Mises stress, noting that increasing the minor principal stress from 0 to 500 decreases the von Mises stress from 1000 to 866, and asks for an intuitive understanding of this effect.
  • Another participant explains that von Mises stress is a measure of shear, which depends on the differences between principal stresses, emphasizing that the third principal stress is zero.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of the differences in principal stresses in relation to the failure of ductile metals, suggesting that this understanding is somewhat intuitive.
  • One participant introduces a video on failure theories, discussing the distinction between shear stress and hydrostatic pressure in relation to material failure, and critiques the presentation of these concepts as established facts in textbooks.
  • This participant also shares a link to additional information regarding hydrostatic pressure and failure modes, indicating a broader context for understanding these phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and intuition regarding the relationship between minor principal stress and von Mises stress. There is no consensus on the underlying reasons for the observed behavior, and the discussion includes both technical explanations and critiques of educational approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the lack of underlying reasons for why shear stress leads to failure in ductile materials while hydrostatic pressure does not contribute, suggesting that these details are often omitted in educational contexts.

DTM
Messages
75
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Following the formula for von Mises stress, can you give an intuitive explanation of why the von Mises stress may go down when the minor principal stress goes up.
The formula for von Mises stress for a plane stress (2d) condition with no shear stress is:
1684346630404.png

So if S1 = 1000, S2 = 0 , then Svm = 1000.

If the S2 is now increased from 0 to 500. The von Mises stress will go from 1000 to 866

I understand this is how the equation works, but can someone give me an intuitive understanding of why, when you increase a minor principal stress, the von Mises stress (and the likelihood of failure) should go down?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
VM stress is a measure of shear which is a function of the DIFFERENCES of the principal stresses. Don’t forget that the third principal stress is zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cherish, Chestermiller and DTM
Frabjous said:
VM stress is a measure of shear which is a function of the DIFFERENCES of the principal stresses. Don’t forget that the third principal stress is zero.
So differences in principal stresses is what makes ductile metals fail. That does make some sense and is somewhat intuitive. Thank you.
 
Here is a nice video about failure theories which includes Von Mises.



I recommend checking out almost all vídeos from that channel. It's fantastic.

This actually raises the question of why is it that shear stress is responsible for failure in ductile materials while hydrostatic pressure does not contribute. Often textbooks present this kind of information as FACTS because it is not really necessary to know the underlying reasons to be able to squeeze every drop of utility out of a structure by using math.
Since the amount of material to be covered during courses is huge, more often than not these kinds of details are left for the student to research on their own if interested or in separate courses. In my opinion, knowing the experimental and historical context within which such formulas are derived usually helps significantly in their understanding.

Here is some additional info about that hydrostatic pressure scenario and failure modes.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...l through shear,move dislocations in this way
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude and DTM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K