Why Does Increasing the Cross-Sectional Area of a Wire Reduce Heat Dissipation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Increasing the cross-sectional area (A) of a wire reduces heat dissipation due to its effect on resistance (R) and power (P) dissipation. The power dissipated in a resistor is defined by the equation P = ρLI²/A, where ρ is resistivity and L is length. When A increases, R decreases, leading to lower power dissipation in scenarios where current (I) is constant. However, if a constant voltage is applied, increasing A can lead to increased current and thus increased power dissipation, demonstrating the dependency of I on R in different circuit configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and its applications
  • Familiarity with electrical power equations
  • Knowledge of resistivity and its impact on resistance
  • Basic concepts of series and parallel circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Ohm's Law in constant voltage vs. constant current scenarios
  • Study the relationship between resistivity and temperature in conductors
  • Learn about the thermal characteristics of different materials used in wiring
  • Investigate the effects of wire gauge on electrical performance and heat dissipation
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in circuit design or analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in optimizing wire performance and heat management in electrical systems.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
The power dissipated in a resistor of resistance ##R## with current ##I## passing through it is ##I^2 R##. We can write ##R## as ##\rho \frac{L}{A}## where ##L## is the length of the wire and ##A## is the cross sectional area of the wire. Clearly, increasing ##A## decreases ##R##. Why is less heat dissipated in thicker wires, though? I thought changing the resistance of the wire changes the current passing through it as well. How can we guarantee from the equation ##P = \frac{\rho L I^2}{A}## that increasing ##A## decreases ##P##? Isn't ##I## functionally dependent on ##R##?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are not applying ohms law correctly. Given a current of 1 ampere through a resistor of 1 ohm will cause a dissipation of 1 watt. There will also be a voltage drop across the resistor of 1 volt. Nothing in ohms law says that says that decreasing the resistance forces the current to increase unless the voltage is fixed. Solve some problems with a voltage source and multiple series resistors. Make some of the resistors several thousand times the value of the smallest resistor which would represent the wire. Changing the smallest resistor slightly will not affect the current in the circuit very much at all. You are not the first poster here who has had similar questions. Strangely enough though, the first time I saw this type of question asked was here on physics forums.
 
It depends on whether you are in a constant current or a constant voltage situation. If the current I is held constant, then everything is as you have written it, and the current is independent of the area A. If you apply a constant voltage to the wire, then the current through the wire is \frac {V}{R}, and the power dissipated is \frac{V^2}{R}. In this case, increasing A will cause R to decrease, I to increase, and the power dissipation to increase.
 
Averagesupernova said:
You are not applying ohms law correctly. Given a current of 1 ampere through a resistor of 1 ohm will cause a dissipation of 1 watt. There will also be a voltage drop across the resistor of 1 volt. Nothing in ohms law says that says that decreasing the resistance forces the current to increase unless the voltage is fixed. Solve some problems with a voltage source and multiple series resistors. Make some of the resistors several thousand times the value of the smallest resistor which would represent the wire. Changing the smallest resistor slightly will not affect the current in the circuit very much at all. You are not the first poster here who has had similar questions. Strangely enough though, the first time I saw this type of question asked was here on physics forums.

Averagesupernova said:
You are not applying ohms law correctly. Given a current of 1 ampere through a resistor of 1 ohm will cause a dissipation of 1 watt. There will also be a voltage drop across the resistor of 1 volt. Nothing in ohms law says that says that decreasing the resistance forces the current to increase unless the voltage is fixed. Solve some problems with a voltage source and multiple series resistors. Make some of the resistors several thousand times the value of the smallest resistor which would represent the wire. Changing the smallest resistor slightly will not affect the current in the circuit very much at all. You are not the first poster here who has had similar questions. Strangely enough though, the first time I saw this type of question asked was here on physics forums.

So the effect of cross sectional area on the dissipated heat I described above only applies to wires which typically have a much smaller resistance than all other components in a circuit. Increasing the cross sectional area of a resistor with significant resistance might not necessarily decrease the heat dissipated in the resistor, right?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
How can we guarantee from the equation P=ρLI2AP = \frac{\rho L I^2}{A} that increasing A decreases P ? Isn't I functionally dependent on R ?

You cannot guarantee it.

As previous posters pointed out, this is not a physics problem but an algebra problem.

If I is a function of A and you wish to vary A , your equation ought to express I in terms of A
 
MohammedRady97 said:
So the effect of cross sectional area on the dissipated heat I described above only applies to wires which typically have a much smaller resistance than all other components in a circuit. Increasing the cross sectional area of a resistor with significant resistance might not necessarily decrease the heat dissipated in the resistor, right?
Jim Hardy pointed it out quite well. It's a math problem. In a resistor any time you double the current through said resistor you will double the power it dissipates. But that scenario isn't exactly what you questioned in your original post. At least through my interpretation. Don't give up. We're here to help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
947
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K