Why Does Kinetic Energy Depend on the Square of Speed?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy depends on the square of speed due to its definition, which aligns with dimensional analysis showing energy units as kg*m^2/s^2. The relationship can be derived from Newton's second law, where the work-energy theorem connects force, distance, and velocity, leading to the formula E = m*v^2/2. This squared dependency also distinguishes kinetic energy from momentum, which is linearly related to speed. The physical interpretation suggests that kinetic energy reflects the energy of motion without directional dependence. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping fundamental physics concepts.
lella
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is it that kinetic energy depends on the square of speed instead of simply speed? Is there an example that shows why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lella said:
Why is it that kinetic energy depends on the square of speed instead of simply speed? Is there an example that shows why?


Its really just because that's the definition of kinetic energy. Momentum is defined as the quantity that depends on the speed linearly.
 
That's a very interesting question - sure its defined that way, but why?

I suppose this isn't truly a satisfatory answer, but we could use dimensional analysis to show that it indeed must be squared:

In SI, we're looking for energy in kg*m^2/s^2

Potentional energy: m*g*h so (kg)(m/s^2)(m) looks good

Kinetic Energy: m*v^2 (kg)(m/s)^2 looks good too!

As far as a "deeper" reason, I don't think I can add anything off hand.
 
The guy above is cute. But I have another explanation.
If the mass is M, and at the beginning it rested on the non-fiction ground.
Then we give it a force F.
We know that after S meters' movement, the kientic of the mass will be E=F*S ;
but now we will express it in another way, with the V and M.
we know the acceleration of the mass is a = F/M
and there is the relation S = V^2/(2*a) = V^2/(2*F/M)=MV^2/(2F)
So E = F*S = MV^2/2
it is the kinetic.:approve:
 
You can get it from the second Newton's law
F=m*dv/dt

According to Work(W)-Energy(E) theorem we have the definition of kinetic energy
dE=dW=F*dx=F*v*dt=m*v*dv=d(m*v^2/2)

From which we get the kinetic energy
E = m*v^2/2

Hope this helps

Prof. Nikitin,
My Quick Online Physics Reference Guide and Help:
http://physics-help.info
 
From a pure foundation and without the benefit of hindsight, the answer of course, is that it is not necessary that kinetic energy be dependant on the square of velocity. This could only have been (and was, by Joule) determined empiracally. The other answer is because momentum, which is the quantity of motion, already does.

Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, it [energy] allows us to note a change of some system's state with respect to time. It also makes sense physically that kinetic energy would depend on the square of velocity since its value does not depend on direction.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
964
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top