I Why does low surface energy imply hydrophobicity?

voila
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
I don't understand why materials with low surface energy are hydrophobic and viceversa. All I can find are quick phenomenological explanations that don't quite deal with the physical (microscopic) process going on.

Could anyone provide a good microscopic picture of why it is that way? What's the role of the bonds in the material and how does it interact with the liquid to make it (or not) spread?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just that if the surface energy between a solid and air is unusually small, it's more likely that replacing the air with a liquid will make the surface energy larger.
 
@hilbert2 Say you have a metal surface. How are the bondings between the metal and the liquid?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top