Why Does NGC 7603's Bridge Defy Redshift Expectations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeventhSigma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
NGC 7603 features a bridge linking different objects with varying redshifts, raising questions about its formation. Some speculate that the differing redshifts could be due to background galaxies coincidentally positioned. The filament's redshift aligns closely with NGC 7603, suggesting a potential connection. However, the presence of emission lines in certain objects complicates the interpretation of their relationship. The discussion critiques the notion that redshift is an unreliable distance indicator, labeling it as an unfounded anomaly.
SeventhSigma
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
This is a galaxy cluster that has an apparent bridge linking it

Even though the redshifts are very different for different objects within it. What is the most likely explanation for this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
To take a completely random guess, I'd say they were background galaxies simply placed in those spots by coincidence.
Given the much greater redshift value, smaller size and luminosity, and the fact that the filament is approximately the same redshift as NGC 7603, I could believe it.
But I'm not a professional. The paper linked from the webpage indicates that objects 2 and 3 are emission lines, not absorption lines like the two galaxies are, so I don't know.
 
Last edited:
NGC 7603 is one of Arp's oddities cited as 'evidence' redshift as an unreliable distance indicators. I am well aware of this 'anomaly' and it is rubbish.
 
Chronos said:
NGC 7603 is one of Arp's oddities cited as 'evidence' redshift as an unreliable distance indicators. I am well aware of this 'anomaly' and it is rubbish.

Can you elaborate on why it is rubbish?
 
Would also like an elaboration
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Back
Top