Why Does the Binomial Theorem Summation Not Equal 2n When n Varies?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancy between the binomial theorem summation and the expression 2n when varying n. The user initially applies the binomial theorem with x = y = 1, leading to the conclusion that the summation of binomial coefficients equals 2n. However, they encounter inconsistencies when substituting specific values for n. The resolution lies in recognizing that combining terms incorrectly doubles the coefficients, resulting in an erroneous equation. Correct application requires careful handling of terms, particularly when n is even or odd.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Binomial Theorem
  • Familiarity with binomial coefficients, denoted as {n choose k}
  • Basic knowledge of factorial notation and operations
  • Concept of even and odd integers in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Binomial Theorem in detail, focusing on its applications and implications.
  • Learn about the properties of binomial coefficients and their combinatorial interpretations.
  • Explore the concept of generating functions and their relation to binomial expansions.
  • Investigate the implications of parity (even vs. odd) in combinatorial identities.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying combinatorics, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of the Binomial Theorem and its applications.

Puzzedd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Using summation((\stackrel{n}{k})xkyn-k) = (x+y)n, I let x = y = 1. This should then result in summation((\stackrel{n}{k})*1*1) = (1 + 1)n = 2n.

Expanding the summation, I get

(\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n.

Solving this results in

\frac{n!}{0!(n-0)!} + \frac{n!}{1!(n-1)!} + \frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!} + ... + \frac{n!}{(n-1)!(n-(n-1))!} + \frac{n!}{n!(n-n)!} = 2n

1 + n + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!} + \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{3!} + ... + n + 1 = 2n

2 + 2n + n(n-1) + \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{3} + ... = 2n

The issue I am having is that when I plug values of n into the left side I do not get the same answer with the right side.

n = 0 results in 2 + 2(0) + ... = 2, not 20
n = 1 results in 2 + 2(1) + 1(1-1) + ... = 4, not 21
n = 2 results in 2 + 2(2) + 2(2-1) + \frac{2(2-1)(2-2)}{3} + ... = 8, not 22
n = 3 results in 2 + 2(3) + 3(3-1) + \frac{3(3-1)(3-2)}{3} + ... = 16, not 23

This seems as if (\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n should really be

(\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n+1

Can anyone tell me why solving this summation is not consistent with the binomial theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem lays in the fact that {n\choose k}={n\choose n-k}. While manipulating the expanded factorial form of the series you combined these coefficients, effectively doubling the terms for each choice of n. Whereas for n=0 there should be exactly one term, n\choose 0, you instead have two terms {n\choose 0}+{n\choose n}.
(Which is equal to 2{0\choose 0}).
 
JThompson is right.

If you wish to combind \binom{n}{k} and \binom{n}{n-k} to get \binom{n}{k}+\binom{n}{n-k}=2\binom{n}{k}, you need to stop in the middle, or you will double the whole thing and get 2·2n=2n+1.

If n is odd, you get:
2\binom{n}{0}+2\binom{n}{1}+\ldots+2\binom{n}{\frac{n-1}{2}}=2^n
So the last term should be when k = (n-1)/2. If n=1, the last term should be when k=0, which means there'll only be one term: 2\binom{1}{0}=2
If n=3, you get: 2\binom{3}{0}+2\binom{3}{1}=8 etc.

If n is even, you get:
2\binom{n}{0}+2\binom{n}{1}+...+2\binom{n}{\frac{n}{2}-1}+\binom{n}{\frac{n}{2}}=2^n
So the last term should not be multiplied by 2. That is when k = n/2. If n=0, k will also be 0 in the last term. Since it's the last term, it should not be multiplied by 2.
Exapmles where n is even:
n=0: \binom{0}{0}=1
n=2: 2\binom{2}{0}+\binom{2}{1}=4
n=4: 2\binom{4}{0}+2\binom{4}{1}+\binom{4}{2}=16

So if you wish to combind 2 terms to get fewer terms, remember to stop in the middle, and if n is even, don't multiply the last term by 2.
If you want, you could also just keep all the terms and not multiply any of them by 2.
 
Thanks! I spent an hour thinking about it last night and couldn't see what I was doing wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K