Why Does the Fourier Transform of Autocorrelation Equal the ESD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dionysian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Autocorrelation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fourier Transform of the autocorrelation function equals the Energy Spectral Density (ESD) of the original signal, as established by the Wiener-Khinchin theorem. This theorem asserts that the Power Spectral Density (PSD) is the Fourier Transform of the autocorrelation function, highlighting the relationship between autocorrelation and frequency characteristics. A sharply peaked autocorrelation function results in a broad power density spectrum, exemplified by random noise signals where the autocorrelation is a delta function, leading to a uniform spectrum. For a deeper understanding, reference materials on Fourier transforms and signal processing are essential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform concepts
  • Familiarity with autocorrelation functions
  • Knowledge of Energy Spectral Density (ESD) and Power Spectral Density (PSD)
  • Basic principles of signal processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Wiener-Khinchin theorem in detail
  • Explore mathematical derivations of the Fourier Transform
  • Learn about the differences between Energy Spectral Density and Power Spectral Density
  • Review textbooks on signal processing and Fourier analysis
USEFUL FOR

Signal processing engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between autocorrelation functions and frequency analysis in signals.

dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dionysian said:
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
Please be careful: ESD and PSD (energy and power spectral density) are not interchangeable.
You are inquiring about the Wiener-Khinchin theorem, which states that the PSD is the Fourier Transform (FT) of the autocorrelation function (and vice versa). Here is an online mathematical derivation:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wiener-KhinchinTheorem.html"
The W-K is intuitively reasonable. It predicts, for instance, that a sharply peaked autocorrelation function R transforms to a broad power density spectrum. Think about a random noise signal for which R is a delta function; the FT of a delta is a uniform spectrum, and indeed random noise has a white spectrum. Other examples are also easily imagined.
I recommend that you check out the discussion in a textbook for more details. The W-K theorem is discussed in every text on Fourier transforms, signal processing, and if you are a physicist, statistical mechanics (because of the interest in characterizing random fluctuations).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahhh haa... I just found that in one of my books. Thanks. I just needed someone to point me in the right direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K