Why does the inside of a conductor have the same electric potential everywhere?

AI Thread Summary
The electric potential inside a conductor is uniform only when the conductor is in equilibrium, due to the free movement of electrons. If there were a potential difference, charge flow would occur until the potential gradient disappears. In electronic devices, the conducting channel is often out of equilibrium, resulting in a potential gradient. The presence of an electric field causes charges to redistribute until they create a polarization field that counteracts the external field. Understanding these principles clarifies why potential is constant in equilibrium but can vary in non-equilibrium situations.
lifeiseasy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
My teacher said so, but I just don't understand why. Is it because of the free movement of electrons inside the conductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lifeiseasy said:
My teacher said so, but I just don't understand why. Is it because of the free movement of electrons inside the conductor?
That statement is only true if the conductor is in equilibrium.
 
Think of it this way: If the potential wasn't zero everywhere in the conductor, due to the many free electrons in a good conductor, there would be charge flow against this potential gradient and the gradient would vanish very quickly.

But as Hootenanny pointed out, this is true only for equilibrium. In an electronic device where you want steady state current flow, the conducting channel is always out-of-equilibrium and there's a potential gradient across it.
 
lifeiseasy said:
My teacher said so, but I just don't understand why. Is it because of the free movement of electrons inside the conductor?

Yes. If there is a potential difference, it means existence of an electrical field E and the force eE. In a conductor the charges move until their new charge distribution creates a polarisation field compensating the external one.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top