Why Does the Integral of Legendre Polynomials Yield a Kronecker Delta?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the integral of Legendre polynomials and its relationship to the Kronecker delta function, particularly in the context of Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates. Participants explore the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials and methods to evaluate the integral, including Rodrigues' formula and generating functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the integral of the product of two Legendre polynomials yields a Kronecker delta function, indicating orthogonality when the indices differ.
  • Another participant suggests using Rodrigues' formula as a potential method for evaluation.
  • A different approach is proposed involving the generating function for Legendre polynomials, which leads to a series expansion and normalization factor.
  • Participants discuss the normalization factor, with one asserting it to be 2/(2L+1) when L = L', derived from comparing coefficients in power series expansions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials and the resulting implications for the integral. However, there is no consensus on the methods for evaluating the integral or the derivation of the normalization factor, as different approaches are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the properties of Legendre polynomials and their integrals, as well as dependencies on the definitions used in the generating function and Rodrigues' formula. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in the evaluation of the integral.

Don'tKnowMuch
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am doing a Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates and have come to a part of the problem that has the integral...

∫ P(sub L)*(x) * P(sub L')*(x) dx (-1<x<1)

The answer to this integral is given by a Kronecker delta function (δ)...

= 0 if L ≠ L'

OR...
= 2/(2L+1)*δ if L = L' (where δ = 1)

I believe the reason why the integral is equal to zero when L ≠ L' is because of the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials, however i cannot figure out how the integral is equal 2/(2L+1). If L = L' then the integral would equal...

∫ [P(sub L)*(x)]^2 dx

I tried to use a simple power rule of integration to solve the above integral, but i am afraid my method is flawed. Any suggestions?

Pre-emptive thanks to whomever takes the time to help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For clarity i should add that...

P(sub L)(x)

is a Legendre polynomial
 
I think i have to use Rodrigues' formula
 
This is one possibility. Another is to use the generating function, which is used to define in the msot convenient way the Legendre polynomials.

It's given by
\Phi(r,u)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2u r+r^2}}=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty} P_l(u) r^l.
From this you find
P_l(u)=\frac{1}{l!} \left .\frac{\partial^l}{\partial r^l} \Phi(r,u) \right|_{r=0}.
This series expansion is obviously valid for |r|&lt;1 if |u|&lt;1.

We know that the Legendre Polynomials are orthogonal to each other since they are solutions of the eigen-value equation
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} u} \left [(1-u^2) \frac{\mathrm{d} P_l}{\mathrm{d} u} \right ]=-l(l+1) P_l,
where the differential operator is self-adjoint on L^2([-1,1]). Thus we have
\int_{-1}^{1} \mathrm{d} u P_l(u) P_{l&#039;}(u)=N_l \delta_{ll&#039;}.
To evaluate the normalization factor we take the following integral:
I(r)=\int_{-1}^{1} \mathrm{d} u \Phi^2(r,u)=\int_{-1}^{1} \mathrm{d} u \frac{1}{1-2 u r +r^2}=-\left [\frac{1}{2r} \ln(1-2 u r+r^2) \right]_{u=-1}^{u=1}=\frac{1}{r} \ln \left (\frac{1+r}{1-r} \right ).
Expanding this into a power series in r yields
I(r)=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \frac{2}{2l+1} r^{2l}.
On the other hand from the definition of the Legendre Polynomials by the above given series expansion you get
\Phi^2(r,u)=\sum_{l,l&#039;=0}^{\infty} P_l(u) P_{l&#039;}(u) r^{l+l&#039;}.
Integrating over u leads to
I(r)=\sum_{l,l&#039;=0}^{\infty} N_l \delta_{ll&#039;} r^{2l}=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty} N_l r^{2l}.
Comparing the coefficients in both expansions of I(r) yields
N_l=\frac{2}{2l+1}.
QED.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K