Why Does the Matrix Transformation Not Equal dxdydz?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iraser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proof regarding the equality of the matrix transformation and the differential volume element dxdydz. The user struggles to establish that the matrix product of partial derivatives, represented as a Jacobian matrix, equals dxdydz. Despite multiple attempts and verification using Wolfram Alpha, the user concludes that the expressions do not equate. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between partial derivatives and total differentials in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus, specifically partial derivatives.
  • Familiarity with Jacobian matrices and their applications.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus and dot products.
  • Experience with mathematical software like Wolfram Alpha for verification of calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobian matrices in multivariable calculus.
  • Learn about the relationship between partial derivatives and total differentials.
  • Explore the concept of the dot product in vector calculus.
  • Investigate the application of matrix transformations in physics and engineering contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or vector analysis who seeks to deepen their understanding of matrix transformations and differential forms.

Iraser
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, could anyone help me with this proof?
| dx/dr dx/d0 dx/d@ |
| dy/dr dy/d0 dy/d@ | dot [drd0d@] = dxdydz
| dz/dr dz/d0 dz/d@ |

d0 is d[theta] and d@is d[phi]

i cannot get this to equal, after solving it many ways i always get 3dxdydz - 3dxdydz??

Any help would be appreciated

[EDIT]

Well i have attempted this multiple times, and verified this with Wolfram Alpha as well. This can not be proved to equal dxdydz
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are asking about the product of a matrix times a vector?

[tex]\begin{bmatrix} <br /> \frac{dx}{dr}&\frac{dx}{d\theta}& \frac{dx}{d\phi}<br /> \\ \frac{dy}{dr}&\frac{dy}{d\theta}& \frac{dy}{d\phi}<br /> \\ \frac{dz}{dr}&\frac{dz}{d\theta}& \frac{dz}{d\phi}<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> \begin {bmatrix}<br /> dx\\dy\\dz<br /> \end {bmatrix}[/tex]

If you're asking something about the dot product of vectors, you need to explain how the thing on the left side of the expression is a vector.

My guess is that you're trying to prove something involving calculus by applying simple algebra to the differential expressions. That might not work. For example, if

[tex]x = f(r,\theta,\phi)[/tex] some books might write

[tex]dx = (\partial x/ \partial r) dr + (\partial x/ \partial \theta) d\theta + (\partial x/ \partial \phi) d\phi[/tex] to indicate how to approximate a small change in [tex]x[/tex].

I suppose some books might use [tex]dx/dr[/tex] instead of [tex]\partial x/ \partial r[/tex] Will some kind person please explain this distinction?
 
You didn't explain what your symbols represent exactly.
So I'm going to make an educated guess.
Did you mean the following?

[tex] \begin{bmatrix} <br /> \frac{dx}{dr}&\frac{dx}{d\theta}& \frac{dx}{d\phi}<br /> \\ \frac{dy}{dr}&\frac{dy}{d\theta}& \frac{dy}{d\phi}<br /> \\ \frac{dz}{dr}&\frac{dz}{d\theta}& \frac{dz}{d\phi}<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> \begin {bmatrix}<br /> dr\\d\theta\\d\phi<br /> \end {bmatrix} <br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix} <br /> \frac{dx}{dr}dr + \frac{dx}{d\theta}d\theta + \frac{dx}{d\phi}d\phi<br /> \\ \frac{dy}{dr}dr + \frac{dy}{d\theta}d\theta + \frac{dy}{d\phi}d\phi<br /> \\ \frac{dz}{dr}dr + \frac{dz}{d\theta}\theta + \frac{dz}{d\phi}d\phi<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix} <br /> dx<br /> \\ dy<br /> \\ dz<br /> \end{bmatrix} [/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K