Why does the propagation constant in the Helmholtz equation include j?

  • Thread starter Thread starter baby_1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the presence of the imaginary unit "j" in the propagation constant γ of the Helmholtz equation. It highlights confusion regarding the equation γ = j √(ω²μ(1 - jσ/ω)), where the factor of j appears to be a mistake. Participants clarify that the correct representation should reflect a negative sign for the propagation constant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical representation of electromagnetic wave propagation. Overall, the inclusion of j is linked to the complex nature of wave behavior in lossy media.
baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
This is my own question: Why do we intentionally include the imaginary unit jj in the propagation constant after taking its square root?
Relevant Equations
Helmholtz equation
Here is my question:
$$
\nabla^2 \bar{E} + \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) \bar{E} = 0
$$

where

$$
\gamma = \alpha + j \beta
$$

$$
\gamma^2 = \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right)
$$

$$
\gamma = j \sqrt{ \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) }
$$

why is there a factor of j in the expression for γ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baby_1 said:
$$
\gamma^2 = \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right)
$$

$$
\gamma = j \sqrt{ \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) }
$$

why is there a factor of j in the expression for γ?
Yes, the ##j## outside the square root in the second equation above looks like a mistake. If you square this equation, you do not get the first equation.

Where did you see the second equation?
 
Dear TSny,

Thank you for your help.
In many electromagnetics resources, I have noticed that the propagation constant is often represented with a "j," but I am having trouble understanding why this is the case. I have attached one of the references for your review.
 

Attachments

I realized my mistake: in the main equation, the sign of the propagation constant should be negative. Thank you once again for your help!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
749
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
703
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K