Why does the propagation constant in the Helmholtz equation include j?

  • Thread starter Thread starter baby_1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inclusion of the imaginary unit "j" in the propagation constant γ of the Helmholtz equation. The equation presented is $$\nabla^2 \bar{E} + \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) \bar{E} = 0$$, where γ is defined as $$\gamma = j \sqrt{ \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) }$$. Participants clarified that the presence of "j" indicates the complex nature of the propagation constant, essential for representing wave attenuation and phase shift in electromagnetic theory. A correction was noted regarding the sign of the propagation constant, emphasizing the importance of accurate representation in electromagnetic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Helmholtz equation in electromagnetics
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their applications in wave propagation
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave theory, including attenuation and phase shift
  • Basic grasp of the physical significance of the parameters ω (angular frequency), μ (permeability), and σ (conductivity)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Helmholtz equation in electromagnetic contexts
  • Learn about the implications of complex propagation constants in waveguides
  • Explore the role of complex numbers in electrical engineering applications
  • Investigate the relationship between conductivity, permittivity, and wave propagation in lossy media
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those specializing in electromagnetics, wave propagation, and related fields. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of complex propagation constants in the context of the Helmholtz equation.

baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
This is my own question: Why do we intentionally include the imaginary unit jj in the propagation constant after taking its square root?
Relevant Equations
Helmholtz equation
Here is my question:
$$
\nabla^2 \bar{E} + \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) \bar{E} = 0
$$

where

$$
\gamma = \alpha + j \beta
$$

$$
\gamma^2 = \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right)
$$

$$
\gamma = j \sqrt{ \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) }
$$

why is there a factor of j in the expression for γ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baby_1 said:
$$
\gamma^2 = \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right)
$$

$$
\gamma = j \sqrt{ \omega^2 \mu \left( 1 - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} \right) }
$$

why is there a factor of j in the expression for γ?
Yes, the ##j## outside the square root in the second equation above looks like a mistake. If you square this equation, you do not get the first equation.

Where did you see the second equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baby_1
Dear TSny,

Thank you for your help.
In many electromagnetics resources, I have noticed that the propagation constant is often represented with a "j," but I am having trouble understanding why this is the case. I have attached one of the references for your review.
 

Attachments

I realized my mistake: in the main equation, the sign of the propagation constant should be negative. Thank you once again for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
799
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
726
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K