Why Does the Top Quark Move More Sluggishly Than the Bottom Quark?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Air
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quark Search
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the top quark compared to the bottom quark during the decay of a W boson. It is established that momentum conservation dictates that the top quark, being significantly heavier, moves more sluggishly than the lighter bottom quark. The relationship between their momenta is expressed as p_t >> p_b, leading to the conclusion that v_t << v_b. Additionally, the decay process is complicated by the fact that the top quark's mass exceeds twice that of the W boson, rendering the decay physically impossible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation laws in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the properties of quarks, specifically top and bottom quarks
  • Knowledge of W boson decay processes
  • Basic principles of Lorentz covariance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and interactions of the W boson in particle physics
  • Study the implications of mass differences in particle decay processes
  • Explore advanced concepts in momentum conservation in high-energy physics
  • Learn about the role of Lorentz covariance in particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of quark interactions and decay processes in high-energy physics.

Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
The Question:
In their search for the top quark, physicists thought that another particle called the W might decay while stationary into one top and one bottom quark. They predicted “The resulting top quark moves off relatively sluggishly on one side while the lighter bottom quark travels more rapidly in the opposite direction”. Using an appropriate conservation law, explain why the top quark moves off more sluggishly than the bottom quark.


My Answer:
Momentum is conserved in all direction. The total momentum is zero. [itex]p_t >> p_b \implies v_t << v_b[/itex]. Greater mass means slower speed hence the top quark was significantly slower that bottom quark to balance momentum.


My Problem:
The answer that I have given is correct according to the mark scheme and I would gain full marks. However, I want to know more about the theory in greater clarity hence didn't post this in homework help as the question is answered. I want a detailed explanation which would make my answer sound more powerful and convincing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air said:
The total momentum is zero. [itex]p_t >> p_b[/itex]
Hold on, there is something odd here. I guess you are mentionning an electron-positron collider if the total momentum is zero (in the initial state). But in the final state, the total momentum would be [itex]p_b+p_t\neq 0[/itex] according to your condition.
 
Your answer (with "[tex]m_t \gg m_b[/tex]" rather than "[tex]p_t \gg p_b[/tex]", of course) is clearly what the question is driving at -- it really is that simple, all the power comes from momentum conservation. The whole weak interaction that describes just how a [tex]W[/tex] boson could decay to two quarks is much more complicated, but still has to obey that fundamental conservation law (typically repackaged as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_covariance" for notational simplicity).

If you don't mind a silly answer, you could point out that this particular decay is physically impossible because the top quark ended up being more than twice as heavy as the [tex]W[/tex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K