Why Does the Trollpi Calculation Not Equal 1?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mjordan2nd
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of trollpi and the calculation of its perimeter. The flaw identified is in the definition of arclength, where the correct formula is ds=sqrt(1+(dy/dx)^2)dx, rather than ds=dx+dy. The user utilized Mathematica to integrate the function but initially arrived at incorrect results due to miscalculating the contributions of dy and dx. After adjusting the integral to account for the absolute values, the user successfully confirmed that the perimeter equals 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with Mathematica for computational mathematics.
  • Knowledge of arclength calculations in Cartesian coordinates.
  • Basic concepts of positive and negative values in calculus derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of arclength in polar coordinates.
  • Learn advanced integration techniques in Mathematica.
  • Explore the implications of absolute values in calculus.
  • Investigate the convergence of series and shapes in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and the properties of geometric shapes.

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
If you don't know what trollpi is, you can see it here:

http://qntm.org/files/trollpi/piequals4.png [1]

It seems to me that the flaw in this problem is that while the shape may converge to a circle, the way you measure the perimeter is ds=dx+dy=1+(dy/dx) not ds=sqrt(1+(dy/dx)^2 )dx as usual. So I tried using this new definition of the arclength in the first quadrant with r=0.5 and integrating expecting to get 1. I put the following into mathematica:

Integrate[1 - x/Sqrt[0.25 - x^2], {x, 0, 0.5}]

This did not give me 1. Can someone explain why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I may have figured out an answer to this. I started thinking that possibly the reason this is not 1 is because dy and dx can be positive or negative, so not all pieces of the arclength would add -- some would subtract. So I tried to do this

Integrate[Sqrt[(1 - x/Sqrt[1/4 - x62])2], {x, 0, 1/2}]

This was not correct either, however, since what I had effectively done was make ds=|dy + dx|. What I really needed was |dy|+|dx|=ds. Realizing that in quadrant I dy/dx was always negative all I needed to do was to flip the sign in my original integral. Plugging in

Integrate[1 + x/Sqrt[0.25 - x^2 ], {x, 0, 0.5}]

gave me 1, like I was expecting. It seems that my analysis was wrong because I effectively dropped a negative.

If someone could confirm that this makes sense, it would be appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K