Why Does Theoretical Pressure Exceed Empirical Values in Hail Cannon Designs?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Velocity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the discrepancies between theoretical and empirical pressure values in the design of a hail cannon, specifically focusing on the calculations needed to propel ice balls at a desired velocity. Participants explore the complexities involved in modeling this scenario, including the use of Bernoulli's equation and other relevant physics principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their hail cannon design and the empirical results obtained, noting a significant difference between the theoretical pressure calculated using Bernoulli's equation and the actual pressure measured.
  • Another participant suggests using the impulse-momentum principle, proposing an equation that relates pressure, area, time, mass, and velocity, while acknowledging their lack of expertise in the area.
  • A participant with experience in compressed air guns highlights the complexities of the situation, including rapid gas expansion, non-steady state conditions, and the deformation of hail balls during firing, which complicate theoretical calculations.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of accurately modeling the pressure needed to achieve a certain velocity due to numerous assumptions and variables, expressing doubt about the accuracy of any theoretical model.
  • A participant asks for clarification on the terminal velocity of the hail, indicating a need for more specific data to further the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the applicability of theoretical models to the problem, with some suggesting that the complexities involved may preclude accurate theoretical predictions. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the discrepancies between theoretical and empirical pressures.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their models, including the assumptions made regarding fluid dynamics and the physical properties of ice, as well as the challenges posed by the rapid expansion of gas and the behavior of hail balls during firing.

mpm
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question; however, it is probably similar to one.

I am doing a design project that involves a hail cannon. Basically I have created an air gun that propels ice balls.

I have a compressed air tank, with an electronic quick release valve and then a barrel made of PVC.

My question is this,

I have tested the gun with different size hail. I have a chronograph to measure velocity, and I have a pressure gauge in the air tank. We tested different air pressures until we found one that resulted in a particular velocity. (In this case its the terminal velocity of falling hail.)

Anyway, I now have to calculate what these pressures should be theoretically. I've tried using Bernoulli's equation with little luck. I get answers but the theoretical pressures come out higher than the empirical pressures. Obvsiously this is impossible, so either I'm doing it wrong or I'm not seeing the over all picture.

Can anyone give me some suggestions on what equation I can use or maybe where to start.

For the record, empirically we have 6.5psi shoots .5" diameter hail at a velocity we want. When doing it theoretically, the same diameter hail shoots the same velocity at 9.5 psi.

Hence the reason why I think I am going wrong somewhere.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not my area of expertise but from what I remember Bernoulli's equation gives the velocity of the fluid that is flowing not the object it may be pushing. In this case I would recommend using Force= pressure x area and work out the impulse on the hale that you are firing. Impulse is the change in momentum of a particle caused by the force, so I guess you know how long the jet of air acts upon the hail and you'd have an equation something like.

P x A x T = m x v

Where T is the time the force is acting m is the mass and A is the area its acting upon. Anyway like i say this is not my area of expertise but maybe posting first might get the ball rolling on more replies.

Good luck!
 
I actually have experience with a large compressed air gun, shooting hail balls at jet engines.

The situation is rather complex for a few reasons. First, you are dealing with a rapid expansion of the gas. It is hardly steady state and incompressible and good luck finding a streamline, which throws Bernoulli right out the widow. Secondly, you are expanding across a time varying orifice (your valve). Next, you have the inconsistancies of your hail ball and the leakage of the compressed air around the hail ball. Also, unless you have a high speed camera, chances are you are deforming your hail balls during the shot, so you can't rely on the idea of having a sphere or whatever shape you started with.

Honestly, I think that your 9.5 psi guess isn't too bad considering what you have to deal with. I know the percentage difference sucks, but this is not an easy thing to solve. There are a lot of variables involved.

Perhaps if Clausius or Brewnog see this thread they will comment as well.
 
So am I to assume that the pressure needed to propel the ice a certain velocity cannot be solved theoretically without taking a long time to do?

My professor wants me to do it, but I don't know if it can be done. I have talked to 2 other professors who haven't lead me in the right direction yet. I'm starting to think it can't be modeled because of so many assumptions and variables.

At least in my opinion, if it can be modeled, I don't see how it can be that accurate.

I used P-Po = 1/2*rho*V^2

However, I think I am wrong because I used the density of ice and the velocity it needs to travel. This is part of Bernoulli's equation and that is for fluid flow. Ice obviously isn't a fluid so I think this would be wrong to use. Also when I graph several velocities, the graph is way off.

Any more help would be appreciated.
 
What is your terminal velocity for the hail?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K