Why does this forum and it's members hate progress

  • Thread starter Thread starter o-man
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The forum prioritizes discussions on mainstream science rather than speculative theories, emphasizing that significant scientific advancements occur in academic and research settings, not online platforms. Many members express skepticism towards contributions from those without advanced degrees, which can discourage participation from non-experts. The community staff has established guidelines to maintain this focus on established scientific knowledge. While some responses may come off as dismissive, members are encouraged to report any rudeness. Overall, the forum aims to foster educational discussions rather than speculative debates.
o-man
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have been reading threads on possible new theories and ways to have them read and commented on. In every single thread the majority of answers read something like " you wouldn't be asking this question if you had a phd and since you don't have a phd you can't add anyhting to the conversation." of course this quote is very simplified but the thrust of most of the answers is the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you possibly add to the body of human knowledge if you don't know what's already been done?

Furthermore, the mission of the forum is not to progress science. We mainly wish to have discussions on mainstream science (that is, the science that is known now). New science will never be invented on forums or the internet. That's mainly being done at universities, as labs, companies, etc.
 
There is a difference between fantasy and real progress.

The community staff has decided the path PF takes is one of mainstream science and education. There are many other communities that cater to speculative theory discussion.

I do agree your quote sounds very rude and I hope no one talks like that. Report it if you see it.
 
o-man said:
. In every single thread the majority of answers read something like " you wouldn't be asking this question if you had a phd and since you don't have a phd you can't add anyhting to the conversation."

If this is true in every single case, you should be able to present examples. Can you give me, say, five?
 
See: PF Needs A Personal Theory Forum Like We Need A Computer Virus
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=2979
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
509
Back
Top