Why Does This Mathematical Expression Equal Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baggio
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The mathematical expression in question equals zero because the terms represent points in the complex plane that form the vertices of a regular polygon. Each point acts as a vector originating from the center, and the symmetry of the polygon ensures that these vectors sum to zero. This conclusion holds true unless a specific condition is met, where the variable c is a multiple of q/r, causing all vertices to converge at a single point. Understanding this geometric interpretation clarifies why the term evaluates to zero. The discussion effectively illustrates the relationship between complex numbers and geometric shapes in mathematics.
Baggio
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
URGENT: Why does this tern = 0??

Can anyone tell me why the term in the bracket = 0??

where i= root -1 and all vars are integers

I'm at a loss :-/
 

Attachments

  • equation.gif
    equation.gif
    6.6 KB · Views: 534
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Each exponential in the sum represents a point in the complex plane and if you look at the terms carefully you will see that the set of points comprise the vertices of a regular polygon. Think of each point as being a vector from the origin to the given point. Being the vertices of a regular polygon, the vectors must add to zero! That is, unless c is a multiple of q/r in which case all the vertices converge to a single point.
 
Hehe, ok I think that makes sense.. thanks
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top