I Why does this needle get an E field while this disk gets a D field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences between the E field and D field in dielectric cavities, particularly why a needle exhibits an E field while a disk shows a D field. The relationship between these fields is defined by the equation D = ε₀E + P, indicating that D is a scaled version of E that accounts for polarization. The conversation highlights the importance of boundary conditions, noting that the normal component of D is continuous across boundaries, while the tangential component of E is continuous. It also mentions that in ideal dielectrics, free charges are typically absent, which affects the behavior of these fields. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the nuances of polarization in dielectric materials.
CrosisBH
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
1573087321045.png


So I'm reviewing old lectures to prepare for an exam soon. This is about polarization. E fields, D Fields, etc. My professor labeled this diagram like so. The figures my professor drew are cavities in a dielectric if you can't read her handwriting. However, I can't seem to figure out why the needle gets an E field, and the disk gets an D field. She stated that if we turn the disk cavity 90 degrees to align with the needle, we get an E field.

$$\textbf{D} = \epsilon_0\textbf{E} + \textbf{P} = \epsilon\textbf{E}$$

This equation doesn't make it obvious to me why it is so. The D field is in the direction of the E field, since a D field is a scaled up E field with polarization in mind. My only guess is that the size of the needle being small makes some things negligible.

Thank you for any help you can give!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E and D are different quantities, that have some values in both cavities. If there is vacuum in cavity then: ##\vec{D}=\epsilon_0*\vec{E}##
 
CrosisBH said:
This equation doesn't make it obvious to me why it is so.

Have a look at "ELECTRIC FIELD WITHIN A CAVITY INSIDE A DIELECTRIC" (from physicspages.com):
ELECTRIC FIELD WITHIN A CAVITY INSIDE A DIELECTRIC ...
 
A great book, for some reason totally underrated in the textbook universe, is

J. Schwinger, Classical Electrodynamics

There you find a careful analysis of all standard constitutive equations using simple classical (non-relativistic though!) models.

The standard key word to look for in this and other books is the "Lorentz-Lorenz formula" or "Clausius-Mosotti Law".
 
The way I understand this is in terms of boundary conditions. The normal component of ##D## is continuous across a boundary while the tangential ##E## field is continuous across a boundary. Both pictures neglect fringing fields near the disk edge and the cylinder ends. At the center of the disk the normal ##D## is the same inside and outside the cavity. Near the midpoint of the cylinder, it's the tangential ##E## that's the same inside and outside the cavity.
 
Hm, usually the normal component of ##\vec{D}## is discontinuous with the jump being equal to the surface charge. This follows from the macroscopic Maxwell equation,
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho_{\text{free}}.$$
 
True, within dielectrics usually you have no free charges. I thought you made a general statement about the boundary conditions.
 
Certainly true that the step in normal ##D## is the surface charge in all cases. For ideal dielectrics, ##\rho_\text{free}=0## so in most cases this step is zero. One may always inject a surface charge onto a boundary but the statement of the problem would need to include this else the boundary value problem isn't specified completely.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Back
Top