Why Does Time Seem to Slow Down in High-Stress Situations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the perception of time slowing down in high-stress situations, such as during sports or accidents. Participants explore whether there is a physics-based explanation for this phenomenon or if it is primarily a psychological interpretation of time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the experience of time slowing down is more about the mind's interpretation rather than an actual change in time perception, as no human can travel fast enough to notice time dilation.
  • One participant argues that actual time dilation would not be perceivable because the firing of neurons in the brain would also slow down, keeping the sense of time proportional.
  • Another participant proposes a connection between relativity and bodily functions, suggesting that in high-adrenaline situations, chemical reactions in the body speed up, which could relate to the perception of time.
  • Some participants challenge the idea that bodily functions can speed up or slow down in relation to time dilation, asserting that proper time does not change within the same reference frame.
  • There is a discussion about the invariance of the speed of electromagnetic forces and how it relates to chemical reactions in the body, with some arguing that this does not affect personal experience of time.
  • One participant introduces the concept of a light clock to illustrate how time can appear to slow down in different reference frames, emphasizing that the speed of light is constant across all frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between time perception and physics, with no consensus reached on whether the phenomenon is psychological or has a basis in physical principles.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying time perception, the definitions of time in different contexts, and the implications of relativity on human experience.

pharmdlb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When I started playing football as a wide receiver I remember several times when the ball was passed to me that time seemed to slow way down and it took forever for the football to get to me.

We know that time slows down as we get closer to the speed of light, but obviously I'm not traveling at any greater speed. So what is causing time to slow down? I've also heard of this time slow down happening when people have a car accident.

Maybe this is more of a psychology question than a physics question, but I'm just wondering if there is a physics explanation for this phenomenon.


Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org


Yeah that seems like it's more your mind's interpretation of time, no human can travel anywhere near fast enough to notice time dilation.
 


pharmdlb said:
When I started playing football as a wide receiver I remember several times when the ball was passed to me that time seemed to slow way down and it took forever for the football to get to me.

We know that time slows down as we get closer to the speed of light, but obviously I'm not traveling at any greater speed. So what is causing time to slow down? I've also heard of this time slow down happening when people have a car accident.

Maybe this is more of a psychology question than a physics question, but I'm just wondering if there is a physics explanation for this phenomenon.


Thanks

There isn't. It isn't even related to relativity, since the proper time doesn't change at any speed.

Zz.
 


If you were to experience actual time dilation you wouldn't even be able to sense it, because the firing of neurons in your brain would also slow down, and your whole sense of time would be proportional.
 


You only notice time dilation in other reference frames, so no, this wouldn't be the appropriate explanation. To notice time dilation, you would have to somehow be in a different reference frame than the rest of the world, which of course is not the case.
 


There is a relation.

In relativity the functions of your body speed up or slow down depending on your relative velocity. This is because the speed of forces (the electric force specifically) in your cells is invariant. A lorentz transformation shows that the path is longer between reference frames.

In a high adrenaline situation the functions in your body also speed up, though it is due to a chemical reaction.
 


LostConjugate said:
There is a relation.

In relativity the functions of your body speed up or slow down depending on your relative velocity. This is because the speed of forces (the electric force specifically) in your cells is invariant. A lorentz transformation shows that the path is longer between reference frames.

Er.. come again? In this paragraph, you contradict yourself.

If the "speed of forces" is invariant, then it doesn't matter what frames you are in. Yet, you then show that a lorentz transformation shows something different in each reference frame, which means that whatever it is in NOT invariant.

The functions in your body does NOT slow down or speed up, because presumably you are not having an out-of-body experience and you stay in the same reference frame as your body. So your proper time does not change.

Zz.
 


ZapperZ said:
Er.. come again? In this paragraph, you contradict yourself.

If the "speed of forces" is invariant, then it doesn't matter what frames you are in. Yet, you then show that a lorentz transformation shows something different in each reference frame, which means that whatever it is in NOT invariant.

The functions in your body does NOT slow down or speed up, because presumably you are not having an out-of-body experience and you stay in the same reference frame as your body. So your proper time does not change.

Zz.

The speed of the electromagnetic force that ultimately determines the chemical reactions in your body is invariant. So to someone in a relative reference frame the distance this force must travel is longer, the speed at which these chemical reactions happens is slower or faster relative to them.

Correct, you do not experience any difference within your reference frame, you think at the rate you think. So if you slow down your chemical reactions enough to live longer, you do not experience a longer life, you just live longer relative to someone in another frame.
 


LostConjugate said:
The speed of the electromagnetic force that ultimately determines the chemical reactions in your body is invariant. So to someone in a relative reference frame the distance this force must travel is longer, the speed at which these chemical reactions happens is slower or faster relative to them.

Correct, you do not experience any difference within your reference frame, you think at the rate you think. So if you slow down your chemical reactions enough to live longer, you do not experience a longer life, you just live longer relative to someone in another frame.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. The speed of the electromagnetic force (i.e. the speed of light) is always the same in every reference frame. What slows down in an accelerated reference frame is time. And in order for this effect to be noticable when catching a football, the football would have to be thrown in a highly accelerated reference frame, in which case you'd be unable to catch it for reasons unrelated to relativistic effects.

Perhaps you could clarify what you mean.
 
  • #10


arunma said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. The speed of the electromagnetic force (i.e. the speed of light) is always the same in every reference frame. What slows down in an accelerated reference frame is time. And in order for this effect to be noticable when catching a football, the football would have to be thrown in a highly accelerated reference frame, in which case you'd be unable to catch it for reasons unrelated to relativistic effects.

Perhaps you could clarify what you mean.

Time is just a measurement. You can't say time slows down without a physical explanation.

To simplify things instead of using a human body let's use a light clock. A light clock being two mirrors parallel to each other with light bouncing back and forth between the mirrors, counting one unit of time each time it makes a full cycle.

Now the speed of light is constant in all reference frames. So if you accelerate (in a perpendicular direction to the motion of the light) this clock to a relative reference frame and observe the path of the light ray from your rest reference frame you will see that the length the light travels is longer before it hits each mirror. So the clock relatively slows down. It is precisely because the speed of light is a constant that this is possible. This is why clocks measure "time" as slowing down.

The human body is just a complex light clock.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K