Why Does V1 Equal Zero in My KCL Thevenin Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fjolvar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to finding the Thevenin equivalent circuit using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). Participants are attempting to resolve issues with their equations, particularly concerning the value of V1, which appears to equal zero in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over why V1 equals zero in their KCL equations, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the dependent current source relation.
  • Another participant questions the initial expression for the current is, suggesting it should be (v1-8)/2 instead of 8v/2Ω.
  • There is a correction made regarding the term in the KCL equation, with participants discussing the correct formulation of the current source.
  • Some participants suggest that V2 might be the variable that equals zero instead of V1, leading to further clarification on the node analysis.
  • One participant proposes an alternative method to find the Thevenin equivalent by applying a test voltage across the terminals and calculating the current drawn.
  • Another participant suggests connecting V2 to 0V with a wire to simplify the circuit analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value of V1 and whether it should indeed be zero. There are multiple competing views regarding the correct setup of the equations and the interpretation of the circuit elements.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the dependent sources and the specific circuit configuration, which may affect the analysis. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in relation to the dependent current source's influence on V1.

Fjolvar
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
I tried solving this problem using KCL, but V1 keeps adding up to zero for my second set of equations. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Any help is much appreciated.

1. Homework Statement

I need to find the Thevenin equivalent circuit. I chose to find the Isc and the Voc by using KCL, since I don't see another way.

o72d0w.jpg


Homework Equations


KCL

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
You can see for equation 2, my V1 equals zero due to the dependent current source relation. Not sure how to get around this.

2vltrf5.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right at the start you write is = 8v/2Ω

Why do you say this?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Right at the start you write is = 8v/2Ω

Why do you say this?

My mistake. That should read (v1-8)/2.

I'm still stuck on the second equation however since v1 equals zero. Am I missing something obvious here?
 
My mistake. That should read (v1-8)/2.

I don't think that's right either.

Edit: Do you mean "Is = (v1-8)/2" or that term in equation should be (v1-8)/2 ? The latter is correct.
 
Last edited:
CWatters said:
I don't think that's right either.

Edit: Do you mean "Is = (v1-8)/2" or that term in equation should be (v1-8)/2

That's for the term in the first KCL equation. But V1 in the second equation equals zero which has me stuck. I can't set up my equations to find any of the unknowns.
 
I think you mean V2 = 0 not V1.
 
CWatters said:
I think you mean V2 = 0 not V1.

I mean (-1/20 + 1/20) zeroes out V1 at node 2, since the dependent source is equal to 0.05V1
 
Fjolvar said:
You can see for equation 2, my V1 equals zero due to the dependent current source relation. Not sure how to get around this.
I see the problem. They cunningly have the current source always draining the entire current sourced through the 20Ω.

An alternative method to determine the impedance at ab is to apply a test voltage across ab and calculate how much current is drawn from that source. I guess that means the Thévenin equivalent will then be a simple resistance.
 
NascentOxygen said:
I see the problem. They cunningly have the current source always draining the entire current sourced through the 20Ω.

An alternative method to determine the impedance at ab is to apply a test voltage across ab and calculate how much current is drawn from that source. I guess that means the Thévenin equivalent will then be a simple resistance.

I'm not quite sure what you mean :/
 
  • #10
If V2=0 you can connect node V2 to 0V with a wire. Try that and redraw the left hand side of the circuit.
 
  • #11
Fjolvar said:
I'm not quite sure what you mean :/
Connect a 1v supply to the right-hand side of a-b and calculate the current that flows into a-b from that 1v source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K