Why does vasodilation in periphery lead to reduction in blood pressure?

AI Thread Summary
Vasodilation in peripheral blood vessels leads to a reduction in blood pressure by increasing the capacity for blood flow, which decreases vascular resistance. When peripheral vessels dilate, there is more room for blood, resulting in lower pressure in the arms and legs where blood pressure is measured. This phenomenon can be likened to expanding a fluid-filled container, where less pressure is exerted against the walls. The discussion also highlights that while pressure can be compared to voltage in circuits, the relationship is not directly analogous due to differences in how blood flow and resistance operate in the vascular system. Overall, understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping how peripheral vasodilation affects blood pressure.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

Ok generally what do they mean when they say vasodilation in periphery lead to reduction in blood pressure? Do I have to think of this as expanding the size of a fluid filled container so less fluid splashes againts the walls reducing pressure. Or do I have to think of this like a circuit where decreasing the resistane of a resistor results in decreased pressure just upstream of that resistor. Thank you :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conventional blood pressure, which has become a standard vital measurement is measured around a person's arm, where vasodilatation is relevant (large arteries, smaller arterioles and large veins.)

If the arm vessels dilate, the pressure there will decrease.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasodilation
 
Last edited:
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Conventional blood pressure, which has become a standard vital measurement is measured around a person's arm, where vasodilatation or contraction is negligible.

If there is more room for blood in the periphery where vasodilatation occurs (the capillaries in fingers, face, organs etc), there is a little less blood in the arms (and legs and main arteries), so the measured pressure there is reduced.

Thanks a lot for the answer :smile: but here is where I'm getting confused with circuits. In a circuit if I have 2 parallel circuits, both would get the same voltage but different current depending on the resistance. So if I directly think of voltage as pressure, shouldn't the pressure be same in legs and fingers. Is this a case where the pressure and voltage analogy doesn't work. If so I understand. Thank you :smile:
 
After review, I had to make an important correction in my first post. My physiology is further than I thought.
 
sameeralord said:
Hello everyone,

Ok generally what do they mean when they say vasodilation in periphery lead to reduction in blood pressure? Do I have to think of this as expanding the size of a fluid filled container so less fluid splashes againts the walls reducing pressure. Or do I have to think of this like a circuit where decreasing the resistane of a resistor results in decreased pressure just upstream of that resistor. Thank you :smile:

There's a simplified model of blood pressure, involving the ejection volume from the heart, systemic vascular resistance, and central venous pressure:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_pressure

The major driver of vascular pressure are the arterioles and capillaries. Increasing the peripheral blood flow decreases the vascular resistance, leading to a decrease in arterial pressure.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top