Why doesn't direct current work in a transformer circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kuzey Cem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the operation of transformers with direct current (DC) versus alternating current (AC). Participants explore the reasons why DC does not effectively transfer power in transformer circuits, examining theoretical principles and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a changing current is necessary to produce a changing magnetic field, which induces current in the secondary coil, while DC does not provide this change after initial application.
  • One participant mentions that applying DC would eventually lead to core saturation in a transformer, resulting in heat generation.
  • Another participant notes that while DC transformers are mentioned in high voltage applications, there is inconsistency in their effectiveness, with some devices working and others not.
  • A participant clarifies that the resistance of a transformer primary coil is not zero at DC, countering a previous claim about inductor resistance.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of magnetic field lines and their interaction with conductors, with some participants emphasizing that the field does not need to "cut" the conductors but rather be encircled by them.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the operation of transformers with DC, with no consensus reached on the nuances of magnetic field behavior and the effectiveness of DC transformers in certain applications.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about ideal versus real transformers, and there are unresolved questions about the behavior of magnetic fields and their interaction with coils.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in electrical engineering, physics of electromagnetism, and practical applications of transformers may find this discussion relevant.

Kuzey Cem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I recently learned that if you send direct current through the primary coil of a transformer, no power would be transferred to the secondary circuit? Why is that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you tell us why it works for AC? If so, then you should know why it does not work for DC.
 
Theoretically, it would work. Since the flux in the core of the transformer increases by the integral of the applied voltage (Faraday's law), in an ideal transformer, the flux would just continue to increase. However, if you tried this with an actual transformer, you would drive the core into saturation and create a lot of heat.

Dr. Frank Ferrese
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OliskaP
A Straight Answer:
A changing current produces a changing magnetic field, which in turn can induce a current in the secondary. If the current is not changing, the magnetic field is not changing, so no current is induced in the secondary.

When you first apply a DC voltage the current ramps up, so the field is changing and an initial current is induced in the secondary. But when the current stops changing (limited by resistance, for example) there will be no current induced into the secondary.
 
Picture time. :approve:

transf.gif


http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/transf.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and berkeman
I don't know why but i have read on other sources that people use ac/dc transformers on high voltage dc applications of 60v or more. they used the simple wall-warts to convert the high dc voltage to lower dc voltage.
however even then, they still said that some wall-warts worked and some didnt.
Dont know why that works with higher DC voltages but know it does. sometimes!

check out this link: people on that forum use them a lot.
https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=75171&p=1135736&hilit=wall+warts#p1135736
 
Referring to the picture, if most of the magnetic flux stays inside the iron core, how do moving field lines cut through the secondary coil?
 
I recently learned that if you send direct current through the primary coil of a transformer, no power would be transferred to the secondary circuit? Why is that?

The inductor has 0ohm resistance at dc
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NascentOxygen
  • #10
SDRFG said:
The inductor has 0ohm resistance at dc

no, that is incorrect. There will be resistance and is easily measured with an Ohm meter
for a transformer primary, it can easily be several 100 to several 1000 Ohms
 
Last edited:
  • #11
David Lewis said:
Referring to the picture, if most of the magnetic flux stays inside the iron core, how do moving field lines cut through the secondary coil?
The field lines do not have to be moving. The changing magnitude and direction (+/-) of the primary current generates a changing flux value, which in turn induces the changing secondary output voltage.
 
  • #12
If the flux value (concentration of field lines) changes, do the magnetic field lines move?
 
  • #13
David Lewis said:
If the flux value (concentration of field lines) changes, do the magnetic field lines move?

It's a quirk of the universe that the "lines" need not "cut" the conductors,
only that they be encircled by the conductors.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday's_law_of_induction and http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

The field itself is more of a continuous fluid than discrete lines. It goes everywhere , just changes its intensity as you get farther from its source.
But drawing lines helps us visualize it and gives us something we can count to gauge its intensity.

A "line" is a called Maxwell, one of them per square centimeter is called a Gauss which is roughly the magnetic field strength of Earth that tugs your compass needle around.
A field strength of ten thousand Gauss is called a Tesla, about the field strength of a good loudspeaker magnet.

Any help ?

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, berkeman and David Lewis
  • #14
Many thanks, Jim. I posed a difficult question that has been puzzling me for a while. Good answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #15
Thanks for the feedback !
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K