Why doesn't the residue theorem work for branch cut integration?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 6K views
gonzo
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
I need help with a branch cut intgration. The problem is to show the following for [itex]0< \alpha <1[/itex]:

[tex] \int_{0}^{\infty}{x^{\alpha - 1} \over x+1}={\pi \over sin\alpha\pi}[/tex]

I used the standard keyhole contour around the real axis (taking that as the branch cut), but using the residue theorem I end up with:

[tex] -\pi i e^{i\alpha\pi}[/tex]

Which obviously doesn't match. Although this does match up for alpha equals one half.

Some help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be easier to see what went wrong if you showed more work!

What was your residue? (I think you were Ok here)

How did you deal with the part of the keyhole contour that lies just below the x-axis? I think this is what went wrong. On this part you will be working with a different branch of the logarithm, so z^{alpha} will take on different values here than the bit above the x-axis.
 
Thanks, you actually showed me my stupid mistake. I had just worked through the problem with alpha as one half, in which case the lower and upper part of the branch cuts are the same (well, negatives, but going in different directions, so you get a divisor of 2).

I had naively assumed that it would be the same for this problem. Your comment inspired me to take a closer look and I realized it wasn't the case, and then the answer was trivial.

Thanks!