Why doesn't this method work? (Re: Simultaneous ODEs)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoplite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Odes Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Fourier transforms to solve a system of simultaneous ordinary differential equations (ODEs) involving constants a and b. The original equations are transformed into a new form, but the inverse Fourier transform leads to erroneous results. The key issue identified is the division by the common factor of \(\nu^2 + a^2\), which is mathematically invalid and results in the loss of critical solutions. Participants emphasize the importance of maintaining all factors during transformations to avoid errors in the final solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simultaneous ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Proficiency in Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in differential equations
  • Familiarity with mathematical error analysis in transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of Fourier transforms in solving ODEs
  • Study the implications of dividing by common factors in differential equations
  • Explore advanced techniques in solving simultaneous ODEs
  • Investigate boundary value problems and their solutions in the context of ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in Fourier analysis and error correction in mathematical derivations.

Hoplite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I have been working on a derivation in which the following simultateous ordinary differential equations have appeared:
f^{(4)}(x)-2 a^2 f''(x)+a^4 f(x)+b(g''(x)-a^2 g(x))=0,
g^{(4)}(x)-2 a^2 g''(x)+a^4 g(x)-b(f''(x)-a^2 f(x))=0,
where a and b are constants. I figured that I could solve this using Fourier transforms. First, I transform the above, using \nu as the transform space analogue of x, into the following:
(\nu^2 +a^2 )\hat f(\nu ) -b \hat g(\nu )=0,
(\nu^2 +a^2 )\hat g(\nu ) +b \hat f(\nu )=0.
I then rearrange these equations via substitution into
[(\nu^2 +a^2 )^2 +b^2 ] \hat f(\nu ) =0,
[(\nu^2 +a^2 )^2 +b^2 ] \hat g(\nu )=0.
Taking the inverse Fourier transform then results in
f^{(4)}(x)-2a^2 f''(x)+(a^4 +b^2 )f(x)=0,
g^{(4)}(x)-2a^2 g''(x)+(a^4 +b^2 )g(x)=0.

However, after I solve for these two ODEs using the boundary conditions, I find that the resulting answer is erroneous. I can only conclude that the above methodoly doesn't work, although I can't see why.

Could anyone point out the mathematical error in the above steps?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show your transform... shouldn't you get factors of nu^4?
 
Last edited:
The OP is dividing out a common factor of \nu^2+a^2.
 
vela said:
The OP is dividing out a common factor of \nu^2+a^2.
Yes, that's what I've done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K