Why don't induced charges cancel each other out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OmegaKV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Induced
AI Thread Summary
When a positive charge is brought near a thin conducting sheet, it induces a negative charge on the side closest to the charge and a corresponding positive charge on the opposite side to maintain overall neutrality. The induced charges do not completely cancel out the electric field because their effects vary with distance from the sheet, particularly near the surface. The multipole expansion of the electrostatic field illustrates that while the monopole term represents total charge, higher-order terms account for the distribution of induced charges. Exact solutions for configurations like a point charge near an infinite conducting half-plane or a conducting sphere demonstrate how these induced charges influence the electric field. The distribution of positive and negative charges on the sheet may not be uniform, as intuitive expectations suggest variations based on proximity to the inducing charge.
OmegaKV
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
If you bring a positive charge near a thin conducting sheet, it will induce a negative charge on the side nearest to the charge. And in order for the conducting sheet to remain electrically neutral, a positive charge of equal magnitude will be induced on the other side.

How could the conductor have any significant effect at all on the total electric field? It seems to me like the field from the induced positive and negative charges should "cancel out" everywhere except for points very close to the conducting sheet (i.e. points not much greater than the thickness of the sheet).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have a look at the multipole expansion of the electrostatic field. It starts with a monopole contribution, i.e., a Coulomb field with the total charge of the body as charge in the Coulomb field. Then comes a dipole term, which you can depict as two opposite point charges very close to each other, then a quadrupole term which you can depict as two dipoles very close to each other and so on. Except the very first monopole term the sources of all other terms are equivalent to charge distributions with total charge 0.

There are two examples, where you can solve this kind of problem exactly: A point charge in front of a infinite conducting half-plane or a point charge close to a conducting sphere. Having solved the problem for a point charge, you have in principle also solved it for any charge distribution close to the conductor since what you evaluate there is the Green's function of the electrostatic problem with given boundary conditions due to the conductor.
 
OmegaKV said:
If you bring a positive charge near a thin conducting sheet, it will induce a negative charge on the side nearest to the charge. And in order for the conducting sheet to remain electrically neutral, a positive charge of equal magnitude will be induced on the other side.
Why are you sure that positive and negative charges will have equal distribution on the whole sheet? Intuitively, we may expect more negative net charge at the point below the positive charge, and more positive net charge towards the edges of the sheet.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top