Why Don't Photons Get Absorbed in Double Slit Experiments?

alex440
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi
maybe I'm asking a stupid question, I'm a layman, and i didn't succeed to google out the answer.

while performing single photon double slit experiment,
why the photons don't just get absorbed in the separation between the slits, like they do in the screen behind.

and consequently, what is the maximum width of the slit so we keep seeing interference pattern.

in typical experiment the wavelength is around 0.5 \mum and the separation is around 25\mum, which is 50 times wider.

the only answer i found on the topic is this: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=7209", but it's hard to comprehend

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


alex440 said:
while performing single photon double slit experiment,
why the photons don't just get absorbed in the separation between the slits, like they do in the screen behind.

Most of them do get absorbed not only by the material that separates the slits, but also by the material surrounding the slits.

Take a laser beam and shine it on a wall. You get a bright spot on the wall. Now put into the beam an opaque slide with two narrow slits that are separated by less than the diameter of the beam. The resulting interference pattern is much fainter than the original spot.
 


hi jtbell

well, you mean that single photons are not going the same line, each one is going at a different angle, or in different parallel lines.

those of them who are absorbed, we "lose" them, but those who don't, their wavefunction appears at the both slits.

so that if we'd close the slits, we'd see it absorbed at the place of the left or the right slit, but not at the center.

or, if we'd manage to fire protons with exactness comparable to the slits geometry, we'd get the interference only when we fire them directly in the direction of one of the slits, but not into the the separation.

say, we fire a photon in the direction of the right slit. we fire it from the middle between the slits, at a considerable distance.

in this case, after we fire a photon, his wavefunction probability is 100% on the right slit and 0% on the left slit (as at each other point in space)

but the function itself exists, and does not collapse, since his state did not change.

so the left slit alters the function in such a manner, that it behaves like it has 2 sources now, and it can interfere with itself.

the function collapses only if it has a subject to contact in a nonzero probability location. and it will collapse only in a number of cases predicted by a probability in this location.

thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top