Why ether proves speed of light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oerg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ether
Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
When Einstein conducted thought experiments, he imagined himself moving at the speed of light with a mirror in front. He was later forced to discard the idea of ether and he concluded that light must travel at the speed of light regardless of wherever and whatever speed an observer is moving.

My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oerg said:
When Einstein conducted thought experiments, he imagined himself moving at the speed of light with a mirror in front. He was later forced to discard the idea of ether and he concluded that light must travel at the speed of light regardless of wherever and whatever speed an observer is moving.

My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?

He believed Maxwell's electromagnetic theory, and without an ether, that theory says c is constant.
 
If you were to detect a change in the speed of light, you would be detecting the ether. Think about this for a few moments. Imagine waves rippling on the surface of a pond, if you start moving then the speed of the waves will change relative to you. The idea is the same.
 
The ether theory predicted that Maxwell's laws would only work exactly in a single inertial reference frame, the rest frame of the ether. In other frames the equations governing electromagnetism would look different, according to the ether theory. Einstein discarded this idea, and tried to see how things would have to work in order for Maxwell's laws to work exactly in every inertial reference frame.
 
Oerg said:
My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?

It was the other way. Assuming that the speed of light is constant, together with the fact that in Maxwell´s equations any movement relative to an ether does´t have any observable consequences, he concluded that the concept of an ether was no longer needed.
 
Quite right Ich - no longer needed - but not necessarily obviated
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top