Why have blank margins on the pages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the presence of blank margins on forum pages, which some users find frustrating, especially when composing posts. Users express difficulty in reading their text due to these margins, particularly those over 40. It is noted that screen resolution affects the visibility of margins, with lower resolutions like 1024x768 eliminating them. Additionally, users can customize their browser settings to reduce margins, with specific instructions provided for Firefox. Overall, the conversation highlights user concerns about readability and the potential for customization to improve the experience.
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
I'm curious why the forum pages have blank margins.

I don't know about how browsers and the basic web page arrive at the final display of a page, so I may not appreciate how difficult it would be to get rid of the margins. Being considerably "over 40", I find it difficult to read what I'm typing when I compose a post. It's true I can zoom-in or use a huge monitor etc. But I still begrudge seeing a inch of wasted space on the side of each page and then even more wasted space on the margins of the message composition window.

Apparently it is possible to have web pages without blank margins. I find it intersting that the "old guard" retailers tend to have web pages with blank margins (as if they expect people to print hard copies of the page) and websites like Amazon don't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephen Tashi said:
I don't know about how browsers and the basic web page arrive at the final display of a page, so I may not appreciate how difficult it would be to get rid of the margins. Being considerably "over 40", I find it difficult to read what I'm typing when I compose a post. It's true I can zoom-in or use a huge monitor etc. But I still begrudge seeing a inch of wasted space on the side of each page and then even more wasted space on the margins of the message composition window.

It's all about your screen resolution. If you have trouble seeing your screen you need to use a lower resolution. Try 1024x768. You won't see any margins then, as that is what PF is set for. Anything higher and you'll see a left and right margin.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Try 1024x768. You won't see any margins then, as that is what PF is set for. Anything higher and you'll see a left and right margin.

Thank you. That works.

- but I still get to complain about the big margins around the message composition window!
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Thank you. That works.

- but I still get to complain about the big margins around the message composition window!

That is something I will look at, thanks.
 
You can remove the margins yourself if you like.

This should work in Firefox (with Stylish):
Code:
@-moz-document domain("physicsforums.com") {
 .page {
    width: 99% !important;
 }
}
It does not change the size of the reply box, but that can be adjusted manually (once per post).

I guess other browsers have similar features.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top