Why heavy cars take more time than lighter cars to stop?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohamed Essam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Inertia Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Heavy cars take longer to stop than lighter cars primarily due to their greater mass and momentum, which directly affects the stopping force applied by the brakes. The discussion highlights that while inertia plays a role, it is not the sole factor; the coefficient of friction between tires and the road surface also significantly influences stopping distances. Factors such as tire load sensitivity and brake system design further complicate the relationship between vehicle weight and stopping time. Understanding Newton's laws of motion and the principles of momentum is essential for grasping these dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's laws of motion
  • Momentum (p = mv)
  • Tire load sensitivity
  • Basic understanding of braking systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of tire load sensitivity on braking performance
  • Study the relationship between mass, inertia, and momentum in vehicle dynamics
  • Explore different types of braking systems and their efficiency
  • Learn about the physics of friction and its impact on vehicle stopping distances
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, physics students, driving instructors, and anyone interested in vehicle dynamics and safety.

  • #31
OldYat47 said:
This kind of question makes my head hurt. The accurate statement (which does not fit the teacher's "example") is that to stop a car you need to reduce its momentum to zero. It take more braking effort to stop a heavier car than a lighter car. Full stop.

There is no doubt that my Honda Odyssey can stop more quickly than the 1964 VW beetle I used to have, in spite of the significant weight difference.
You have proper brakes on the new one - probably the Beetle would have had no servo assist and drums all round. I had an old (at the time) Morris 1000 in 1967 with minute drums all round which would over heart and fade at the drop of a hat. In Physics terms - not a fair test.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
My '64 beetle was brand new at the time (revealing my age). And at that time the beetle was among the better-stopping cars around (compared to American cars, for example). Which brings us around to the main point, that heavier does not equal longer stopping distances. Many other factors contribute. Probably no servo assist? That made me smile. The windshield washer had to be pressurized with a bicycle pump. We're talking basic and primitive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #33
I used to get a lift in a woman's lh drive beetle that let water into the heating duct. Condensation On the windscreen made it impossible to see out and she used to drive (in U.K.) with her body where it would have been in a rh drive car. In my (rh ) passenger seat, I was in the path of oncoming traffic. Scary.
 
  • #34
Talk about scary! The only place you would be getting water from is the exhaust leaking into the air shrouds.
 
  • #35
I don't think CO was a problem (no headaches). It was after rain, which came in through rust holes! and trickled into the hot air ducts. I nearly offered to drill some drain holes but I didn't want to get involved.
I have had most of the classic cars that you find on British roads (including a 2CV - my lovely new 2CV) but I never found a Beetle when I needed a car. I did have a VW camper with the same basic engine, though. The brakes on that were fine. - but they had to be, on a commercial transporter chassis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
12K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K