Why in two block systems do both blocks tend to have the same velocity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two blocks in various systems, particularly focusing on why both blocks tend to have the same velocity under certain conditions. The examples provided include a block in a hemispherical bowl and two blocks connected by a spring. The conversation explores concepts related to kinetic and potential energy, center of mass frames, and conservation of momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario with a block in a hemispherical bowl, noting that both the bowl and the block have the same horizontal velocity and questioning why this holds true at the maximum height.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of the center of mass frame, suggesting that both masses have equal and opposite momentum, which minimizes kinetic energy when at rest in that frame.
  • A follow-up post reiterates the center of mass frame idea and questions why kinetic energy is not fully converted to potential energy in the ground frame, hinting at possible restrictions related to the system's dynamics.
  • Further discussion touches on the conservation of momentum and how it imposes restrictions on the system's kinetic energy, particularly in relation to the center of mass velocity.
  • Participants explore the implications of the center of mass frame being a zero momentum frame, discussing its validity in non-inertial frames and the conservation of momentum in such contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in different frames, particularly regarding the center of mass frame and non-inertial frames. There is no clear consensus on the implications of these concepts, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential restrictions related to conservation laws and the dynamics of the system, but these limitations are not fully explored or resolved.

harsh_23
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Why in two block system, both block tends to have same velocity at maximum potential energy when no external force is applied?
Like how can I prove it and why is it the case?
So giving two examples where this happens

Example 1
Consider a hemispherical bowl and a block placed inside it if the bowl is given velocity v𝑣 and given that there is no friction, the block will gain kinetic energy and then will rise to a maximum height h both the bowl and block will have same velocity in horizontal direction and both will have 0 velocity in vertical direction

I get that in vertical direction both will have 0 velocity but why both the block will have same velocity at topmost point.
1000014174.jpg


Example 2
take a two block connected by spring both block are given some velocity then maximum compression or expansion in spring happens when both the blocks have same velocity , here we can get intuition as when both block reaches same velocity there's no chance of maximum compression or expansion but how can I prove it?

1000014176.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the center of mass frame. In that frame both masses will have equal and opposite momentum. The kinetic energy is minimised when that momentum is zero, ie, when both objects are at rest in the center of mass frame.
 
Orodruin said:
Consider the center of mass frame. In that frame both masses will have equal and opposite momentum. The kinetic energy is minimised when that momentum is zero, ie, when both objects are at rest in the center of mass frame.
So in cm frame all the kinetic energy is converted to potential energy , then why does in ground frame all the kinetic energy is not converted to potential energy of the system, are there any restriction? Or is it to do with the system as block leaves the bowl and not net horizontal force in x direction , ok I seem to understand things , so it is better to ask why all the kinetic energy becomes zero in cm frame ?
 
harsh_23 said:
So in cm frame all the kinetic energy is converted to potential energy , then why does in ground frame all the kinetic energy is not converted to potential energy of the system, are there any restriction?
Conservation of momentum imposes a restriction. The center of mass always moves at a velocity of ##v_\text{cm} = \frac{p}{m_\text{tot}}##. Even if all the pieces are motionless relative to each other, the system as a whole must have a minimum kinetic energy of ##KE_\text{min} = \frac{1}{2}m_\text{tot}{v_\text{cm}}^2##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harsh_23
harsh_23 said:
it is better to ask why all the kinetic energy becomes zero in cm frame ?
Because in the CM frame the momenta of the bodies are equal but opposite, and it's a periodic system so they have to swap signs at some time point, which is when both bodies are at rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harsh_23
One more thing is center of mass frame is still zero momentum frame when it is non inertial?

Like I can't conserve momentum when is is non inertial.
 
harsh_23 said:
One more thing is center of mass frame is still zero momentum frame when it is non inertial?
Yes.
harsh_23 said:
Like I can't conserve momentum when is is non inertial.
Not in general, but in this specific non-inertial frame momentum is conserved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K