Why Inductors Create Large Voltage When Switch Opened

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcairtime
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When a switch in a circuit with an inductor is opened, the current rapidly drops to zero, causing the magnetic field to collapse quickly. This rapid change induces a high voltage spike across the inductor, significantly exceeding the supply voltage. The induced electromotive force (emf) is determined by the equation E = L(di/dt), where di/dt represents the rate of change of current. The peak voltage generated is influenced by parasitic capacitance in the circuit, which can form an LC circuit that affects transient voltage levels. Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for grasping the behavior of inductors in electrical circuits.
mcairtime
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I am wondering why such a large voltage can be generated when the switch in a circuit containing an inductor is opened. The following is from a set of Electromagnetism course notes:

"The 1.5 V supply in the circuit below is insufficient to light the neon lamp. A neon lamp needs about 80 V across it before it will light.

http://file:///C:/Users/CPTEMP~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image002.jpg The switch is closed and the current builds up to its maximum value. When the switch is opened, the current rapidly falls to zero. The magnetic field through the inductor collapses (changes) to zero producing a very large induced e.m.f. for a short time. The lamp will flash.
"

I have worked through the mathematics of calculating the emf generated both when the switch is first closed (equal to the emf of the supply) and when the switch is opened, when it can take more or less any value you want by tweaking the values of the resistance of the neon lamp etc. However, I feel like I still do not understand the situation in a fundamental way i.e. in terms of the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage.

If the emf generated in the inductor is 1.5 V when the switch is closed and over 80 V when it is opened then the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage in the inductor must be much greater when it is open. Why is this the case?

Hope it's clear what I'm after but feel free to seek clarification if needs be of course.

Many thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mcairtime said:
the emf generated in the inductor is 1.5 V when the switch is closed and over 80 V when it is opened then the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage in the inductor must be much greater when it is open. Why is this the case?
When a current carrying inductor is open circuited, the current drops to zero in almost no time. There is a sharp decrease in its magnetic field. This rapid collapse of the field induces a voltage spike across the inductor, given by E=Ldi/dt.
An inductor tries to maintain the current through it (by inducing a back emf) and prevents it from changing instantaneously.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
mcairtime said:
Hello,

I am wondering why such a large voltage can be generated when the switch in a circuit containing an inductor is opened. The following is from a set of Electromagnetism course notes:

"The 1.5 V supply in the circuit below is insufficient to light the neon lamp. A neon lamp needs about 80 V across it before it will light.

http://file:///C:/Users/CPTEMP~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image002.jpg The switch is closed and the current builds up to its maximum value. When the switch is opened, the current rapidly falls to zero. The magnetic field through the inductor collapses (changes) to zero producing a very large induced e.m.f. for a short time. The lamp will flash.
"

I have worked through the mathematics of calculating the emf generated both when the switch is first closed (equal to the emf of the supply) and when the switch is opened, when it can take more or less any value you want by tweaking the values of the resistance of the neon lamp etc. However, I feel like I still do not understand the situation in a fundamental way i.e. in terms of the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage.

If the emf generated in the inductor is 1.5 V when the switch is closed and over 80 V when it is opened then the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage in the inductor must be much greater when it is open. Why is this the case?

Hope it's clear what I'm after but feel free to seek clarification if needs be of course.

Many thanks in advance.
Are you familiar with the differential equation relating voltage and the change in current for an inductor?
v(t) = L\frac{di(t)}{dt}
That is the starting point for calculating the voltage across an inductor when there is a change in the current through it. In a real circuit, the peak voltage when you open a switch in series with an inductor is limited by the parasitic capacitance across the inductor. That forms an LC circuit that determines the peak transient voltage. Alternately, you can get a spark at the switch if that voltage is lower than the parasitic LC circuit's peak voltage.

Does that help? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top