Why is average velocity=(v+u)/2

  • Level: High School 
  • Thread starter bloodhound
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
8 replies · 12K views · last reply
bloodhound
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading through a study guide and currently going through the kinematics section.

In the section on uniform acceleration it gives all the standard formulae and explains how they are derived.

It says that average velocity = s/t, but also that it is equal to (v+u)/2 if the average velocity is uniform.
Can someone explain this second part to me please? I understand the concept of averages and that we are dividing by 2 because we are only using 2 values, v and u. But through explaining the concept how does adding together v and u bring us the average velocity?

Thanks.
 
How about this:
v = u + at (or: at = v - u)

s = ut + 1/2at^2
ave velocity = s/t = (ut + 1/2at^2)/t = u + 1/2at = u + 1/2(v - u) = (v+u)/2.
 
Doc Al said:
How about this:
v = u + at (or: at = v - u)

s = ut + 1/2at^2
ave velocity = s/t = (ut + 1/2at^2)/t = u + 1/2at = u + 1/2(v - u) = (v+u)/2.

Yes that makes sense, thanks.

However in the book, it seems like it is saying that through a common sense approach this can be explained; i.e. not through using the other formulae.

Here is how it is written in the book:

Placeholder graphic reading Photo not found with a camera icon and the words CLICK for Photos over a blurred photo of a kitten yawning.

Placeholder graphic reading "Photo not found. CLICK for Photos" over a blurred photo of a kitten with its mouth open, with a camera icon below.

Placeholder graphic reading 'Photo not found. CLICK for Photos' over a blurred photo of a kitten with its mouth open, and a camera icon below.
 
Does the forum software have a trim option to prevent this?
 
It is the 3rd picture which contains the sentence that is causing me grief.
It says 'Since the velocity is changing uniformly we know that this average velocity must be given by:

average velocity = (v+u)2.

Without using the other equations of uniform motion, why is this the case, why must it be given by (v+u)/2?
 
Phrak said:
Does the forum software have a trim option to prevent this?

To prevent what?
 
bloodhound said:
However in the book, it seems like it is saying that through a common sense approach this can be explained; i.e. not through using the other formulae.
There's nothing wrong with that. If something varies uniformly (linearly) that reasoning is fine. For example, if a flat incline goes from a height of 5 m to 25 m, what's the average height? Right in the middle, which is (5 + 25)/2 = 15 m.
 
Phrak said:
Does the forum software have a trim option to prevent this?

bloodhound said:
To prevent what?

To prevent oversized attachments from messing up the formatting. (Which makes the posts harder to read.)

I've seen this happen quite a bit. (I'll report it to the admins to see if there's a solution.)
 
Last edited:
Doc Al said:
To prevent oversized attachments from messing up the formatting. (Which makes the posts harder to read.)

I've seen this happen quite a bit.

Oh right, sorry I should have reduced the size. Maybe I can edit it still?