Why is conductance used instead of resistance in circuits?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of conductance versus resistance in electrical circuits, particularly in the context of current and voltage generators, as well as the implications for circuit analysis and design. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of these concepts, including their applications in different types of circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of using conductance in circuit analysis, particularly in relation to current generators, and expresses confusion over its application compared to resistance.
  • Another participant suggests that the choice between using resistance or conductance is arbitrary and context-dependent, noting that conductance can simplify calculations in parallel circuits.
  • Some participants mention that conductance is often preferred in scenarios involving very low resistances to avoid cumbersome calculations with small values.
  • There is a discussion about the use of admittance matrices in AC circuit analysis, with some participants noting their advantages in certain calculations.
  • One participant shares a personal struggle with understanding conductance and expresses a preference for resistance, while another uses a water analogy to clarify the concept of conductance.
  • Several participants discuss the relevance of two-port networks and their parameters (Y and Z parameters) in circuit analysis, indicating their foundational role in understanding circuit behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of comfort and understanding regarding the use of conductance versus resistance, with some favoring one over the other based on context. There is no clear consensus on the superiority of either term, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for their application.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of calculations involving admittance and impedance, particularly in matrix form, and the potential for errors in numerical computations. The discussion also touches on the frequency dependence of these concepts, which may introduce additional considerations in circuit analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for electrical engineering students and professionals interested in circuit analysis, particularly those grappling with the concepts of conductance, resistance, and their applications in various circuit configurations.

Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2
Hello EE forum !

I would like to talk about conductance and resistance. I understand both terms. And formulas that they derived from.

First newbie question: Each element has conductance and and resistance(admittance)? Probably yes, just checking.

Second question: In process of transforming current generators to voltage generators, conductance term is used. Here is what i mean:
[PLAIN]http://pokit.org/get/bdeffacfa7c89d3782ea7e987f740473.jpg
[PLAIN]http://pokit.org/get/05ecbd73c068c173060cf294371735fb.jpg

Now I get the analogy of this but, why is conductance used in the first place? I've seen this everywhere, where current generators are written like this, with conductance multiplied by voltage. Especially in the transistor models.

Now why is this written like this? Why not simply with resistance and voltage?

I mean this bothers me probably because I am new to this term, and I find it pointless because the relation between conductance and resistance is simply inverse proportion. Is there any physics behind it? Because current generators work like this? Any thoughts?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
For a start, it's totally arbitrary whether one uses Resistance or Conductance in any problem. We happen to use Resistance, mostly because it fits many situations. However, where one is dealing with parallel circuits - say a mains distribution system, it could be a great advantage just to add the conductances of all the connected loads without launching off into the 1/R calculations.
Most electrical power supplies tend to approximate to Voltage sources so that goes in favour of looking at most circuits in those terms.

It tends to be a matter of horses for courses but the courses you come across early on tend all to favour Vs and Rs rather than Is and Gs.

In complex antenna design it is quite common to use an Admittance Matrix rather than an Impedance matrix. (At least, I had a colleague who was always hopping from one to the other when feeding and matching multiple VHF transmitting elements for tailored broadcast antenna radiation patterns.) HE was a wow with the Smith Chart!
 
I think i understand. Conductance gave me a headache. I know its not anything complicated but I am so fond of resistance and voltage that I found it difficult to accept. Thank you for your reply.
 
{Conductance and Resistance} ; {Admittance and Impedance}

are reciprocal pairs.

Use the first for DC the second pair for AC. The second pair are frequency dependent and reduce to the first at zero frequency.

Conductances are usually used where vey low resistances are involved as this avoids working in milli or micro ohms.
You will find them in Earth conductance measurements, solution chemistry, fish tanks and so on. that is they are not usually used by electrical engineers.

Admittances on the other hand are used frequently as many AC formulae which involve division by an impedance can be more conveniently rewritten as multiplication by an admittance - hence the admittance or Y matrix that SC mentioned.

Bear in mind that we generally wish to avoid division by very small numbers on numerical calculations.

go well
 
Bassalisk said:
I think i understand. Conductance gave me a headache. I know its not anything complicated but I am so fond of resistance and voltage that I found it difficult to accept. Thank you for your reply.

I hate to suggest using water to help you with this but this scenario may be worth thinking about. As you add outlet pipes to the bottom of a tank of water, more water will flow. Adding litres per second per kPa would make sense, wouldn't it? That's the equivalent of adding Conductances which have the units of Amps per Volt.
 
sophiecentaur said:
I hate to suggest using water to help you with this but this scenario may be worth thinking about. As you add outlet pipes to the bottom of a tank of water, more water will flow. Adding litres per second per kPa would make sense, wouldn't it? That's the equivalent of adding Conductances which have the units of Amps per Volt.

Interesting, I never looked at the parallel resistors that way. I know that resistors in parallel make a smaller equivalent resistor. You just made me realize a lot of things. Thank you ! You just gave me a lot of to think about.
 
Studiot said:
{Conductance and Resistance} ; {Admittance and Impedance}

are reciprocal pairs.

Use the first for DC the second pair for AC. The second pair are frequency dependent and reduce to the first at zero frequency.

Conductances are usually used where vey low resistances are involved as this avoids working in milli or micro ohms.
You will find them in Earth conductance measurements, solution chemistry, fish tanks and so on. that is they are not usually used by electrical engineers.

Admittances on the other hand are used frequently as many AC formulae which involve division by an impedance can be more conveniently rewritten as multiplication by an admittance - hence the admittance or Y matrix that SC mentioned.

Bear in mind that we generally wish to avoid division by very small numbers on numerical calculations.

go well

Yea that is mainly why I stumbled upon those admittances. Because of the matrix calculation. If I may say that I really don't like that part of EE. I just failed my exam in electric circuits, because I had a error in calculation.

We got a 3x3 matrix, complex admittances, using method of potential difference between nodes, find currents in all branches.

A lot of places where u can make small but important calculation errors.

Thank you for your reply, now I distinguish what I learned.
 
The thing to take away from admittance matrices is two port networks. Have you have come across these yet?
 
Studiot said:
The thing to take away from admittance matrices is two port networks. Have you have come across these yet?

This?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-port_network

we call it "Quadripole" here in my country :).

Yes I am doing some problems as we speak, but I didn't come across any problems. We are doing Z-parameters and Y-parameters. We didn't have time to cover hybrid with some examples but we learned it in theory.

I find them very fun to solve!

Third title we are doing is magnetically coupled circuits. They also aren't hard to solve, but as future EE, I will over the summer vacation, do a little research, where I attack this title in deep. I find those coupling very interesting, but I don't have time right now to go into deep physics behind it. I know the basics.

And those Y and Z parameters, yes I learned that by heart, and didn't bust my head thinking over what is what, why is that that way etc etc. Time is not on my side.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Yes that's it, they are very important.

However find a more useful text than Wikipedia. I think you have already done this from what you have said.
 
  • #11
But You as electrical engineer, can you tell me what's the point of finding these Y or Z parameters? What are they used for? in practice i mean.
 
  • #12
Almost every circuit has an input and an output.

What is that if not a two port network?

You can analyse everything from micrcircuits to power stations by cascading such building blocks they ae so basic.

This was why I was saying that from a circuit point of view you don't need in depth knowledge of the physics of device action you describe it in terms of Z and Y parameters.

there was an excellent New Zealand textbook by Gatland

Electronic Engineering Applications of Two Port Networks.

The part contents read like this

Small signal paramters
Two port models
Matrix reduction
Tandem connection of two ports
Feedback amplifiers
Feedbck oscillators
Capacitive effects on transistor analysis
 
  • #13
Studiot said:
Almost every circuit has an input and an output.

What is that if not a two port network?

You can analyse everything from micrcircuits to power stations by cascading such building blocks they ae so basic.

This was why I was saying that from a circuit point of view you don't need in depth knowledge of the physics of device action you describe it in terms of Z and Y parameters.

there was an excellent New Zealand textbook by Gatland

Electronic Engineering Applications of Two Port Networks.

The part contents read like this

Small signal paramters
Two port models
Matrix reduction
Tandem connection of two ports
Feedback amplifiers
Feedbck oscillators
Capacitive effects on transistor analysis


Thank you for your recommendation. I will check that out for sure. I am still in a phase where I mix up what is exactly electrical engineering. I am still obsessed with physics behind everything.
I always think if you understand something, you must be able to explain it to your grandfather so that he understands too.(I think this is Einstein's quote)

I am still overwhelmed with tons of questions why, how, when etc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
903
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K