Why is energy conserved in a frictionless roller coaster ride?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in the context of a frictionless roller coaster ride. Participants explore the implications of external forces, particularly the role of gravity and the forces exerted by the rails, in relation to energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why energy is conserved in a roller coaster ride, suggesting that the force from the rails might be considered an external force that should affect energy conservation.
  • Another participant clarifies that gravity is the only force doing work in this scenario, and since it is a conservative force, energy conservation applies.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of external forces, with a participant referencing the definition of conservation of mechanical energy, which states that external forces must be absent for conservation to hold.
  • It is noted that while the ground exerts an external force on a bouncing ball, this force does no work as the ground does not move, allowing for energy conservation in elastic collisions.
  • A participant emphasizes that external forces do not change mechanical energy as long as they do no work, and suggests that defining the system appropriately (including the track as part of the system) can clarify the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of external forces and their impact on energy conservation. There is no consensus on the interpretation of external forces in relation to energy conservation, particularly in the context of the roller coaster and bouncing ball examples.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of external forces and how they relate to work done on a system. The discussion also touches on the importance of system boundaries in determining energy conservation.

pkc111
Messages
224
Reaction score
26
Could some one please explain to me why energy is conserved in a roller coaster car on a frictionless roller coaster car ride when the conservation law says that energy will only be conserved when their are no outside forces applied. Isnt the force supplied by the rails to change the cars direction an outside force ?

Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pkc111 said:
Could some one please explain to me why energy is conserved in a roller coaster car on a frictionless roller coaster car ride when the conservation law says that energy will only be conserved when their are no outside forces applied.
The only force doing any work in this situation is gravity, which is a conservative force. (Perhaps you are thinking of conservation of momentum; the momentum of a system is conserved if there is no outside force.)
Isnt the force supplied by the rails to change the cars direction an outside force?
Sure (which is why the momentum of the car changes), but that force is always perpendicular to the car's direction of motion, thus it does no work.
 
Thanks Doc Al that helps.

What about an elastic bouncing ball isn't the ground supplying an external force in the direction of motion ? The definition of the law of conservation of mechanical energy I have is:

"Conservation of mechanical energy applies to a mechanical process in which external force and non-conservative internal forces are absent"
http://cnx.org/content/m15102/latest/

It just implies that all external forces must be absent, not just ones in any particular direction.

Thanks
 
pkc111 said:
What about an elastic bouncing ball isn't the ground supplying an external force in the direction of motion ?
Absolutely, but strictly speaking, that force does no work on the ball. (The ground doesn't move.) During the collision, the kinetic energy of the ball will be transformed into elastic potential energy. If the collision is perfectly elastic, the ball will bounce back with the same kinetic energy.

In any case, the external force of the ground changes the momentum of the ball.
The definition of the law of conservation of mechanical energy I have is:

"Conservation of mechanical energy applies to a mechanical process in which external force and non-conservative internal forces are absent"
http://cnx.org/content/m15102/latest/

It just implies that all external forces must be absent, not just ones in any particular direction.
As long as the external forces do no work, they won't change the mechanical energy.

It also depends on how you define your system. In the roller coaster problem, consider the track as part of the system. So any forces between the car and track are internal forces.
 
Thanks very much Doc Al that makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K