Why is F(tang) equal to -dU/ds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oijl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the tangential force, F(tang), acting on a bead constrained to move along a curved wire in three-dimensional space is equal to the negative derivative of potential energy U with respect to the arc length s, expressed as F(tang) = -dU/ds. The proof involves understanding the relationship between conservative forces and potential energy, where the net force F is defined as the normal force N minus the gradient of U. The participants explore the geometric interpretation of the displacement along the wire and the components of the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces and potential energy in physics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically gradients and derivatives
  • Knowledge of three-dimensional geometry and right-angled triangles
  • Basic principles of dynamics related to forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of gradients in vector calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between conservative forces and potential energy
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of forces in three-dimensional space
  • Investigate the application of Lagrangian mechanics to constrained systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of constrained motion along curved paths.

Oijl
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[[F(tang) means the tangential force]]
Consider a bead constrained to move on a tract curved in three-dimensional space, with the bead's position specified by its distance s, measured along the wire, from the origin.

One force on the bead is the normal force N of the wire (which constrains the bead to stay on the wire). If we assume that all other forces (gravity, etc.) are conservative, then their resultant can be derived from a potential energy U. Prove that F(tang) = -dU/ds. This shows that one-dimensional systems of this type can be treated just like linear systems, with x replaced by s and Fx by F(tang).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have before me a solution someone wrote that looks like it could be right, but I can't follow one of the steps. Here is what they have written:

F = N - [tex]\nabla[/tex]U
Where N is the normal force, and F is the net force.
The tangental force will be F(tang) = [tex]\hat{}v[/tex](-[tex]\nabla[/tex]U)

Now consider a small displacement along the wire. Then we should have
ds = ds [tex]\hat{}v[/tex]
***
Then dU = ds[tex]\hat{}v[/tex][tex]\nabla[/tex]U
***
= -F(tang)ds

Therefore you can write
-dU/ds = F(tang)


The part I don't follow is enclosed with asterisks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite follow that proof either, but I offer an alternative one:

Since [tex]\vec F_{conservative_{net}}=-\nabla U[/tex] (Where we've ignored the normal force completely since it is radial to the wire at all times.)
Then it is an immediate consequence that the tangential component of the RHS is the same as the tangential component of the LHS (Since this is a vector equation)

Find a way to express the components of the RHS along the direction of the wire (In the direction of [tex]d\vec s[/tex] using geometry and then use the definition of [tex]\nabla U[/tex] and some algebra to get the desired expression.

Hint on the geometry: [tex]d\vec s = d\vec x+d\vec y+d\vec z[/tex]
Think about right-angled triangles. :) And remember that the magnitudes of these differentials are rarely the same! Do not assume [tex]|{d\vec x}|=|{d\vec y}|=|{d\vec z}|[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, I'm just not getting it. I'm bad at proofs.

So -{grad}U = F∂x, F∂y, F∂z
and
ds = sqr(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)

And doesn't -U = integral(Fdr)?
So...

At any rate, I've slept from sometime after 6:15am to sometime before 7:15am, and that was my full night's sleep. I'm going to put myself down for another hour and a half, and then I'll be back on here to ask more questions in case there's been a response.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K