Why Is My Calculation of Impulse Twice the Correct Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SmokeyBear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Impulse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of impulse during a collision involving a male bighorn sheep, where the impulse was initially calculated as 826.2 Ns using the formula J = mΔv. However, the correct impulse, derived from the area under the acceleration-time graph, is 413 Ns. The discrepancy arises from the failure to account for the non-constant acceleration during the collision, which necessitates the use of average acceleration for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impulse and momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with acceleration and its relationship to velocity
  • Knowledge of graph interpretation, specifically area under curves
  • Basic physics principles, particularly Newton's laws of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of average acceleration in non-constant acceleration scenarios
  • Learn how to calculate impulse using graphical methods
  • Explore Newton's second law and its applications in collision analysis
  • Review examples of impulse-momentum theorem applications in real-world physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding impulse calculations and collision dynamics in mechanics.

SmokeyBear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When a male bighorn sheep runs head-first into another male, the rate at which its speed drops to zero is dramatic. Figure 9-11 gives a typical graph of the acceleration a versus time t for such a collision, with the acceleration taken as negative to correspond to an initially positive velocity. The peak acceleration has magnitude 34 m/s2 and the duration of the collision is 0.27 s. Assume that the sheep's mass is 90.0 kg. What are the magnitudes of the impulse and average force due to the collision?

33o2xdk.jpg



I know impulse is equal to the change in momentum (J = mΔv). So first I found vo by using v = vo + at. After plugging in the numbers, I got vo = -9.18 m/s. I then plugged this into the formula J = mΔv = m(v - vo), where v = 0 m/s, to get 826.2 Ns as the impulse. Unfortunately, the book has exactly half of that as the answer (413 Ns) as the answer. The way they did it was finding the area between the plot and the axis of Figure 9-11, then multiplying it by 90 kg. I understand why this works, but what I don't understand is how my answer comes out to be twice as large.

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SmokeyBear said:
I understand why this works, but what I don't understand is how my answer comes out to be twice as large.
The acceleration is not constant. Use the average acceleration in your formula for speed.
 
How did I miss that? Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K