Why is my circuit nodal analysis not giving the correct I_sc value?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges faced in calculating the short-circuit current (I_sc) in a circuit using nodal analysis. The user attempted to solve for I_sc by applying super node analysis at nodes 1 and 4, but arrived at an incorrect value of 8mA. The correct approach involves recognizing that node 2 is shorted to ground, leading to the conclusion that V2 equals 0. The user utilized Wolfram Alpha to verify their results, indicating the need for accurate application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nodal analysis in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Knowledge of super node techniques
  • Basic circuit theory concepts, including voltage and current definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced nodal analysis techniques in electrical engineering
  • Explore the application of Kirchhoff's Laws in complex circuits
  • Learn about super nodes and their role in circuit analysis
  • Utilize simulation tools like LTspice for circuit verification
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing and solving electrical circuits using nodal analysis techniques.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Capture.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Essentially I am having trouble with solving for I_sc when I remove the load and replace it with a wire.

I used a super node at 1 and 4 and also in my diagram I have defined the currents with directional arrows. I have been on this question for a long time and cannot get the correct answer which is I_sc = 8mA. I know it is wrong because I plugged it into wolfram alpha and ended up with the results as seen below.

From KCL:
photo_18.jpg


Where V1=a, V2=b, V3=c, I_sc=x and solving it gets:
idtsO.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V2 = 0, because node 2 is shorted to ground.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K